My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Item 17
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
120523
>
Item 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/19/2023 11:25:54 AM
Creation date
12/19/2023 11:25:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/5/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 3 of 6 <br />Why does the City need more funding? <br />The General Fund supports both City services and infrastructure. As the community has grown <br />over the years, City services and programs have expanded to accommodate the increase in <br />service demand. The City’s operating costs are also rising due to inflation/increase in the <br />Consumer Price Index (CPI). Overall, the City lost more than $11 million in revenue during the <br />pandemic and has not fully recovered to the pre-pandemic level, impacting the City's financial <br />stability. Rising personnel, contract service, and material and supply costs coupled with <br />reduced hotel tax revenue puts pressure on the General Fund budget. Beyond the current <br />budget cycle, deficits are projected if budget solutions are not implemented. Annual budget <br />deficits are projected to range from $2 million to greater than $7 million. The deficits may be <br />higher if there are economic downturns over the next several years. It will be challenging to <br />keep pace with the service needs expected by the community in future years, and additional <br />resources will be required to sustain services. <br /> <br />In addition, many City facilities, infrastructure, and parks were constructed and renovated <br />during a significant growth period in the 1980s and 1990s. These community-owned assets <br />such as fire stations and park systems are aging and funds are needed to repair and replace <br />them. Anticipating significant future repair and replacement costs, the City Council directed <br />staff to develop a 10-Year Infrastructure and Facilities Replacement Plan as part of the 2017- <br />19 budget adoption in June 2017. The goal was to identify estimated costs and a funding plan. <br />Staff started developing the plan and the work was put on hold due to the COVID-19 <br />pandemic; post-pandemic, staff revisited and updated the plan. The draft plan serves as a <br />guide for a more comprehensive asset management plan and was presented to the City <br />Council in March 2023. The estimated annual repair and replacement costs over the next 10 <br />years for the General Fund and Enterprise Funds total close to $900 million, or approximately <br />$89 million in annual costs. <br /> <br />In June 2023, the City Council approved funding for the development of an Asset Management <br />Plan that will aid the City in identifying costs for maintaining the infrastructure to meet the <br />desired level of service. In addition, various City master plans and assessment reports <br />(facilities, storm drain, parks, sidewalk, etc.) will be developed/updated and incorporated into <br />the comprehensive asset management plan. While the asset management plan is in <br />development, the City needs money to fund both near- and long-term repair and replacement <br />projects, as City facilities and infrastructure will deteriorate over time if not repaired or <br />replaced. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br />What are the polling results? <br />Based on the City Council’s direction, staff and the City’s consultants developed a ballot <br />measure feasibility survey taking into consideration the feedback from the City Council and <br />community and the City’s funding needs. After performing a comprehensive analysis of all the <br />potential revenue options that were presented to the City Council on August 15, 2023, it was <br />concluded that sales tax increase, General Obligation bond, and hotel tax measures are <br />potentially viable. A broader list of revenue options is provided as Attachment 1. <br /> <br />Sales tax is paid by both residents and non-residents (businesses and visitors), ad valorem tax <br />associated with a General Obligation bond is assessed on both residential and commercial <br />property owners, and hotel tax is paid by visitors. For the survey, both sales tax and hotel tax <br />are considered a general purpose tax that requires majority voter approval. Funds can be used <br />Page 219 of 371
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.