ECONOMIC & PLANNING SYSTEMS, INC.

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 2 the assumptions used in the development financial models (see Task 5). Following the project initiation meeting, a revised Work Program can be prepared, as necessary. In advance of the meeting, the EPS Team will obtain and review relevant documents and data from the City, including previous development impact fee studies, discuss issues with City staff, and identify additional information needs, if any. Information sources may include the City’s most up-to-date Capital Improvement Program (CIP), facility master plans, the General Plan, land use projections, bond measure documentation, and other relevant documents. For the affordable housing fees, the group will discuss the City’s goals for the new and updated affordable housing fee programs, the history of the current Housing In-Lieu fee program, and the effects of recent court cases and State policies on the necessary technical analysis and adoption procedures. Task 2: Data Collection and Analysis The EPS Team will work closely with City staff to assemble the land use assumptions, growth projections, service standards, and related capital requirements that will form the basis of the fee program. Among other things, the EPS Team will rely on the City’s General Plan and related follow-up work as a starting point. The EPS Team will define and reconcile land use categories applicable to the fee between prior studies based on appropriate nexus considerations as well as ease of implementation. EPS will also define the operative assumptions, such as population and employment densities for each land use category to be used in estimating demand allocation for new infrastructure. For the Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) study, Fehr & Peers will undertake the following efforts: Obtain a complete set of model files for the City of Pleasanton model, do a basic reasonableness check on the land use and roadway network inputs for both the base year and future year, and confirm the input assumptions with City staff. This review should consider the land use projections recently developed by the City of Dublin, particularly for those areas near the boundary between the two cities, to ensure that the land use inputs seem reasonable. Based on past practice in Pleasanton, our understanding is that the City feels confident in using the citywide Synchro network as the baseline traffic conditions for this study. We are familiar with that network and understand that the counts used in it are the same as the ones analyzed for the 2018 DIF study. Hence, there will not be new count data collected. This assumption will be confirmed with City staff at our kickoff meeting. Review the existing Transportation Development Fee program adopted in 2018. We will review the methodology from the 2018 study and discuss with the EPS Team, City staff and the City Attorney any desired modifications to the nexus approach, as well as options for complying with the new Mitigation Fee Act requirements from the recently passed AB 602. A key issue will be to explore options for charging residential fees based on the square footage of each housing unit. Fehr & Peers has worked with several jurisdictions around the state to develop statistically robust methods for establishing the relationship between square footage and traffic impacts and using that relationship to guide the establishment of fees by square DocuSign Envelope ID: 23AB0CDB-5A6C-4B09-80D1-0F699E28C524DocuSign Envelope ID: CB7E68CB-B5FA-40EC-AA35-142CA6B57242