ECONOMIC & PLANNING SYSTEMS, INC.

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 5 Task 4.1: Public Facilities Fee Update As a part of this effort, the DIF Program costs will be first allocated to new and existing development. Specifically, the EPS Team will review each capital project to determine whether the entire cost or a reasonable portion thereof can be fairly allocated to new growth. The costs for projects that clearly serve both existing and new development will be allocated based on the proportion of the demand generated by each. The EPS Team will ensure that facility needs and costs associated with existing deficiencies in service levels are not included in the proposed fees. The EPS Team will then allocate the development impact fee improvement program costs to the land use categories. This allocation will be based on the relative contribution of each land use type to the demand for the related Improvement Program cost category. Based upon the cost allocation, EPS will prepare a preliminary fee schedule with the total costs attributable to the projected development of each land use type. The fee for each land use will be derived by dividing the relative capital facility costs by the projected development in that land use category. The sum total of the fees for each land use category would become the total AB 1600 fee burden for each land use. EPS will summarize the fees by improvement type and land use for the City’s review. Task 4.2: Transportation Fee Existing Deficiencies The first step in the nexus analysis process will be to determine the locations of existing deficiencies in the City’s transportation network, so that those deficiencies can be accounted for in the fee calculations. We understand that the traffic counts data used in the 2018 study remain as the most up-to-date citywide baseline conditions in the City of Pleasanton. For this reason, the existing deficiency analysis from the 2018 study will be used for all projects that remain in the project list. For any new projects, an analysis of the existing conditions of those roadways will be performed using the same methodology as the 2018 study. This scope of work does not anticipate collecting new traffic data, although that could be added to the scope later if desired. The magnitude of each deficiency will be calculated and used to discount the cost of that particular improvement in the fee calculations. Calculating Fair Share Contributions The next step will be to apportion facility costs to specific land use categories. Using the results of the Pleasanton model application described above, Fehr & Peers will calculate the proportion of usage of each facility in the TDIF that comes from new development in the City. As mentioned above, if the City feels that the current list of projects addressed in that study still reflect the City’s needs, then the nexus percentages calculated for each project in the 2018 study will be used as is. Fehr & Peers will update the PM Peak Hour Trip Demand Factors used in the previous nexus study, incorporating the most recent information on ITE Trip Generation rates. Using the growth projections and these PM peak hour trip demand factors, Fehr & Peers will calculate fees for each land use category that reflect typical impact on the transportation system. As described above, Fehr & Peers will coordinate with the City staff and the EPS Team on options for setting transportation fees based on residential unit square footage. This scope does not assume any data collection or statistical analysis for the purposes of establishing a relationship between square footage and trip generation rates; however, Fehr & Peers has done that type of work in DocuSign Envelope ID: 23AB0CDB-5A6C-4B09-80D1-0F699E28C524DocuSign Envelope ID: CB7E68CB-B5FA-40EC-AA35-142CA6B57242