Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5 <br /> <br /> <br />internally review the provided technical reports for accuracy and adequacy in meeting the <br />requirements of CEQA, and incorporate the results of the analysis into the air quality and GHG <br />emissions section of the IS. <br /> <br />Cultural Resources <br />The cultural resources section will describe the potential effects to historical and archaeological <br />resources from the buildout of the proposed project. Raney will request a search of the California <br />Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) and the Native American Heritage <br />Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File and include the results in the cultural resources section <br />of the IS. Raney will conduct a qualitative assessment of the existing on-site church and daycare <br />to determine potential historical significance and/or potential association with historical persons <br />and/or events. Raney anticipates that a cultural resources report will not be required due to the <br />developed nature of the project site and surrounding area; however, if the CHRIS or Sacred Lands <br />File search determines that more information is required, Raney would propose to contract with <br />an appropriate sub-consultant and amend the contract accordingly. Given the passage of AB 52, <br />and the associated amendments to PRC 21080.3.1, lead agencies are required to consult with <br />Native American tribes early in the CEQA process if one or more tribes have previously requested <br />such notice pursuant to AB 52. It should be noted that AB 52 would not be required if the project <br />is determined to be exempt from CEQA. <br /> <br />Noise <br />The noise section will address potential impacts associated with construction and traffic-related <br />noise and vibration impacts. Raney will rely on the applicant-provided Environmental Noise Study <br />for use in the analysis. As discussed in Task 2, Raney will internally review the provided technical <br />reports for accuracy and adequacy in meeting the requirements of CEQA, and incorporate the <br />results of the analysis into the noise section of the IS. <br /> <br />Transportation <br />The transportation section will be based on the transportation analysis prepared by TJKM. The <br />City’s General Plan EIR was certified prior to July 2020, when vehicle miles traveled (VMT) <br />became the state-wide metric for determining transportation impact significance pursuant to <br />CEQA. Therefore, the transportation analysis in the General Plan EIR focused on impacts related <br />to LOS rather than VMT. Because the IS Checklist will focus on the effects of the proposed project <br />in relation to the impacts previously identified in the General Plan EIR, pursuant to CEQA <br />Guidelines Section 15183, the transportation analysis in the MIS Checklist will be similarly <br />focused on potential impacts related to LOS rather than VMT. Raney and the City will internally <br />review the transportation analysis to ensure all CEQA issues have been adequately and accurately <br />addressed and will incorporate the results of the analysis into the transportation section of the IS. <br /> <br />Remaining Issue Areas <br />The remaining issue areas of the IS will be based upon information provided by the City and/or <br />the project team, and pertinent City documents, including but not limited to the City of Pleasanton <br />General Plan and General Plan EIR, as well as any other pertinent information prepared for the <br />project site and surrounding area. <br /> <br />DocuSign Envelope ID: 3FA212B2-C9C9-4BE6-8FD2-66034B064F8CDocuSign Envelope ID: FE1B6497-6527-4DEE-8F28-BF9999E929AA