Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Resolution No. PC-97-2l <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Stone Pointe Way is a two-lane neighborhood collector street with an <br />environmental capacity of approximately 2,000 to 3,000 vehicle trips per day. <br />ELI's projected traffic levels -- 500 trips -- would total approximately 16% to <br />25% of this street's capacity. <br /> <br />Pedestrian safety, primarily neighborhood children walking to school, would be <br />achieved by designing the school's Stone Pointe Way access driveway and <br />Stoneridge Drive exit driveway at the same level with these streets, providing a <br />clear line-of-site between pedestrians and vehicles, and by posting signs ~ <br />the entrance and exit warn parents of children using the nearby sidewalk. <br /> <br />For private schools, the Pleasanton Municipal Code requires one parking space <br />for each employee equaling 18 parking spaces. The applicant's parking analysis <br />recommends 36 parking spaces. With 48 parking spaces, there would be <br />adequate parking for the entire school based on the operation of the school and <br />as stated in the applicant's parking analysis. <br /> <br />2. The proposed development plan is consistent with the Pleasanton General Plan: <br /> <br />The Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan designates the site for Public and <br />Institutional Facilities. As stated by the Specific Plan: "This site will be <br />reserved for purchase by a church, daycare center, or other appropriate <br />institutional uses, as determined by the Planning Director." Program 3.2 of the <br />Circulation Element of the Pleasanton General Plan states: "Discourage <br />non-local and commercial traffic from using streets through residential areas." <br />Private school facilities are considered to be institutional uses which are a <br />traditional part of the fabric of residential communities. The traffic and parking <br />impacts associated with a 200-student private school on nearby residents have <br />been mitigated, thereby making the proposed project appropriate for this site. <br /> <br />3. The proposed development plan is compatible with previously developed <br />properties located in the vicinity of the site: <br /> <br />The site is an infill property surrounded by a variety of single-family detached <br />residential uses. The parking measures for the ELI campus would prevent <br />parents from parking in the nearby residential neighborhood. <br /> <br />4. The development plan is compatible with the natural, topographic features of <br />the site: <br /> <br />The subject property is flat. Minimal grading is required for building pads and <br />public utilities. Excess storm water runoff will be directed into public street <br />storm drains.i <br />I I <br />