My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ORD 0362
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
ORDINANCES
>
0301 - 0400
>
ORD 0362
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2015 3:08:35 PM
Creation date
10/21/1999 10:46:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
ORDINANCES
DOCUMENT NO
ORD 0362
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br />ORDIN~-~NCE No. 362 <br /> <br /> AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF <br /> CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY, DESIGNATED <br /> ~%S :~ANNEXATION NO. 27, VALLEY VIEW ANNEX <br /> 'B~ ~, TO THE CITY OF PLEASANTON. <br /> <br /> The City Council does hereby recite the following facts and <br />make the following findings: <br /> <br /> SECTION 1. a. On March 25, i963~ tbe Council of the City of <br />Pleasanton did pass and adopt Resolution No. 3378 giving notice <br />of the p~-oposai to annex certain uninb, abited territory to the City <br />of Pieasanton~ said territory 'being therein designated as Annexa- <br />tion No. 27~ Valley View Annex B~, said resolution describing <br />the boundaries of the territory proposed to be annexed. <br /> <br /> b. Said Resolution No. 3378 contained a notice <br />of the day~ hour and place when and where the Council of the City <br />of Pieasanton would hear protests made by any person owning real <br />p~operty within the territory p~oposed to be annexed the time of <br />said hearing being not less than fifteen nor more than sixty days <br />from the date of passage of said Resolution. <br /> <br /> c. On May 6, i963~ at the hour of .~:~ p.m. in the <br />Council Chambers in the City Hall of the City of Pteasanton~ <br />County of Alameda, State of California. said time and place being <br />the day, hour and place fixed in said Resolution No. 3378 for <br />hearing protests to the said annexation, the said City Council did <br />hear and pass upon protests made, there being none, and did deter- <br />mine that protests had not been made by the owners of one-half of <br />tbe value of the privately owned te~-ritory proposed to be annexed <br />as shown by the last equalized assessment roll, nor by public <br />owners of one-half of the value of the publicly owned territory <br />proposed to be a~nexed ~as determined by said legislative body. <br /> <br /> -1-- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.