My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-97-20
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
PC-97-20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:33:05 AM
Creation date
11/17/2004 4:27:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/26/1997
DOCUMENT NO
PC-97-20
DOCUMENT NAME
PUD-96-19
NOTES
EARLY LEARNING INSTITUTE
NOTES 3
REZONE PRIVATE SCHOOL
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />c <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. PC-97-20 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE NEGATIVE <br />DECLARATION FOR THE APPLICATION OF EARLY LEARNING INSTITUTE, AS <br />FILED UNDER CASE PUD-96-19 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Early Learning Institute has applied for rezoning from the PUD (Planned Unit <br />Development) - MDR (Medium Density Residential) district to the PUD - P/I <br />(PubliclInstitutional) district and development plan approval of a revised <br />development plan to construct and operate a private school for up to 200 children, <br />grades one through eight, with two, one-story buildings totaling 17,000 square <br />feet on an approximately 3.51-acre vacant site located on the northerly side of <br />Stoneridge Drive between Stone Pointe Way and the Zone 7 pump station; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, at its meeting of February 26, 1997, the Planning Commission received a <br />proposed negative declaration prepared for Case PUD-96-19; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has received and reviewed the Initial Study dated <br />February 26, 1997, and received the recommendations of staff; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held at which time the public was given the <br />opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts ofthe proposal; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the potential impacts in accordance with <br />the applicable state and local guidelines governing the preparation of Negative <br />Declarations and Environmental Impact Reports; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that approval of the proposed project would not <br />have any significant adverse effects on the environment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.