Laserfiche WebLink
Section 4: Preferred Alternative and Implementation Plan Water Supply Alternatives Study <br />4-7 <br />DRAFT for review purposes only. Use of contents on this sheet is subject to the limitations specified at the end of this document. <br />Water Supply Alternatives Study-Draft Report.docx <br />4.4 Contingency Plan <br />The City needs a contingency plan for how to proceed if the outcome of predesign activities indicate <br />that implementation of Alternative 3 (Two New Wells) is less favorable than anticipated or not <br />feasible due to groundwater quality issues and/or production limitations. For example, the City’s <br />exploratory wells and/or Zone 7’s modeling may identify challenges related to siting new wells <br />capable of meeting the City’s required production rates and water quality standards and preclude <br />the implementation of Alternative 3. <br />In that event, the City may pivot to its efforts to the next lowest cost option, which is completing the <br />remaining design for PFAS treatment under Alternative 2 (Reduced Baseline). Previous work <br />progressed the design to a 50% level. Thus, this shift, if necessary, can occur without impacting the <br />overall schedule to getting an additional water supply into service as quickly as possible. Figure 4-2 <br />summarizes the preliminary schedule for the contingency plan to shift from Alternative 3 <br />implementation to Alternative 2 in terms of major project elements and milestones. The four major <br />project elements identified in the figure include: <br />1.Predesign. Predesign activities are same as those for implementing Alternative 3 and involve: <br />Siting of two well locations, including the City’s planned exploratory wells to test groundwater <br />production rates and water quality and Zone 7’s planned update of its regional groundwater <br />model and Well Siting Master Plan <br />Seeking/securing external funding through grants and/or low-interest loans. <br />2.Design and Construction of the PFAS Treatment Facility and Well 8 Rehab. DBB is the assumed <br />delivery method for design and construction of the treatment facility and Well 8 rehab. Activities <br />related to this element include: <br />Permitting, including NEPA/CEQA and the same permits as those required for Alternative 3, <br />including permits through Bay Area Air Quality Monitoring District (air quality permits for <br />generators), Pacific Gas & Electricity (new/modified service applications), Zone 7 (well <br />drilling and abandonment permits), and the State Water Resources Control Board <br />(construction stormwater). In addition, Alternative 2 requires agreements with DSRSD for <br />PFAS treatment backwash disposal and Pleasant Unified School District (PUSD) for use as a <br />construction staging area. <br />Field investigations/special design coordination <br />PFAS media prequalification <br />PFAS vessel prepurchase <br />PFAS treatment facility and Well 8 site design completion (i.e., remaining 50 percent of <br />design) and construction <br />3.Design and Construction of Pipelines and Connecting Infrastructure. DBB is the assumed <br />delivery method for design and construction of the new pipelines and connecting infrastructure <br />required to tie the new wells into the City’s existing potable water distribution system. Activities <br />related to this element include: <br />Engineer procurement for design of pipelines and connecting infrastructure <br />Permitting, including NEPA/CEQA <br />Utility investigations, including potholing and geotechnical borings <br />Design of pipelines and connecting infrastructure