My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
101723 REGULAR
>
17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2023 10:22:31 AM
Creation date
10/13/2023 9:40:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/17/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Additionally, in April 2023, BC and City Staff met with Zone 7's Staff to solicit initial <br /> feedback on the shortlisted alternatives requiring partnership with Zone 7; this feedback <br /> was provided to the Ad Hoc Subcommittee. Following this, the Zone 7 Water Resources <br /> Subcommittee recommended the Zone 7 Board of Directors toward Zone 7 and the City <br /> working collaboratively to explore these shared alternatives. On September 20, 2023, <br /> the Zone 7 Board unanimously approved accelerating a project to upgrade its <br /> groundwater model, which will assist the City in siting the new wells and inform a <br /> discussion about jointly developing a project to meet both agencies' needs which could <br /> result in cost efficiencies for the City and Zone 7. The groundwater model is scheduled <br /> to be updated by the end of Fiscal Year 2023/24, enabling Zone 7 and the City to <br /> evaluate new wells. <br /> The development and evaluation of alternatives have been rigorous, fast-tracked, and <br /> focused on the criticality of replacing the loss of 3,500-acre feet of water supply (enough <br /> to serve approximately 10,000 homes for a year) with a high-quality, reliable, and cost- <br /> effective water source. Because the City had already advanced the PFAS Treatment <br /> and Rehab Project, this was the "baseline" against which the other viable alternatives <br /> were measured. An exhaustive review of options was conducted. A fatal flaws <br /> screening asked two primary questions: <br /> 1. "Are there technical or institutional reasons the option is not feasible?" <br /> 2. "Is there a potential for lower cost and or increased benefit compared to the <br /> baseline?" <br /> It was determined the following four viable alternatives should advance for more <br /> detailed consideration: <br /> • Option 1 — Baseline, PFAS Treatment, and Wells 5, 6, and 8 Rehabilitation, <br /> includes Centralized Treatment Facility (CTF) at Operations Services Center <br /> (OSC) for all three wells, Well 8 rehab to restore its pumping capacity, and <br /> interconnecting pipelines for Wells 9 and 10 that replaces Wells 5 & 6 to the CTF <br /> • Option 2 — Reduced Baseline, PFAS Treatment for Well 8 only, includes CTF <br /> treatment at OSC, and Well 8 rehabilitations to restore pumping capacity <br /> • Option 3 — Two New City Wells (West of PFAS plume), located within the Bernal <br /> subbasin and with sufficient capacity to reliably deliver the City's full groundwater <br /> quota annually <br /> • Option 4 — 100 percent purchases from Zone 7, including annually purchasing <br /> the full groundwater quota amount from Zone 7 and paying the applicable Zone 7 <br /> water rates associated with these deliveries. To clarify, the City is assumed to <br /> forego pumping its groundwater quota (without waiving such rights), and the <br /> foregone groundwater would presumably be pumped by Zone 7. It may be <br /> necessary for Zone 7 to add facilities or incur costs to perform these services that <br /> are not included in this analysis. <br /> Page 3 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.