Laserfiche WebLink
Section 2: Water Supply Options and Alternatives Water Supply Alternatives Study <br />2-7 <br />DRAFT for review purposes only. Use of contents on this sheet is subject to the limitations specified at the end of this document. <br />Water Supply Alternatives Study-Draft Report.docx <br />Alternative 4 involves purchasing 100 percent of the City’s supply from Zone 7, regardless of the <br />supply source (i.e., assumed to include some combination of supply from the State Water Project, <br />groundwater, and future additions to Zone 7’s supply portfolio). This alternative would require <br />confirmation from Zone 7 regarding agreement terms for Pleasanton’s purchase of an additional <br />3,500 AFY of supply, including: <br />•Delivery confirmation: either year to year, which is the current interim solution, or longer term, <br />which would require an agreement between the City and Zone 7 similar to the “June 2000 <br />Agreement to Construct and Operate a Municipal Well on the Camp Parks Well Site between <br />DSRSD and Zone 7” and would need to replace the supply from the City’s wells while committing <br />to meet peak month and peak day demands (Figure 2-4) <br />•Cost basis: anticipated to be a variable wholesale rate with an increase to the City’s fixed cost, <br />based on a rolling average of the City’s water deliveries from Zone 7 over the previous 2 years <br />•Potential concession for the City not using its GPQ <br />Zone 7 staff have stated that they do not have redundant capacity within their system to pump the <br />City’s GPQ over the long term, which may require capital improvements to secure the 3,500 AF in the <br />same manner as is being considered in the other alternatives. This could increase the cost of <br />Alternative 4, as these costs would likely be passed on directly to the City to avoid redirected impacts <br />on other Zone 7 retailers. However, for this analysis, any City-specific capital improvements by Zone <br />7 have been excluded since they are not yet well-defined. <br />Further, of the four shortlisted alternatives, Alternative 4 requires the most extensive infrastructure <br />improvements, including more improvements to treated water distribution piping, a larger booster <br />pump station at Zone 7’s Turnout 4 designed at 7,000 gpm capacity, and a new turnout from Zone 7 <br />(Appendix E). <br />As noted in the City’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (West Yost, 2021): <br />“The City’s water supplies consist of purchases from Zone 7 (approximately 80 percent of <br />supply in 2020) and groundwater pumped by the City (approximately 20 percent of supply in <br />2020). Of Zone 7’s supplies, imported water from the State Water Project makes up <br />approximately 80 percent, with the remainder coming from groundwater and local surface <br />water. <br />The future reliability of Zone 7’s imported water is a concern. Drought, sea level rise, and <br />natural disasters threaten the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Delta), a critical component of <br />the delivery system bringing water to Zone 7. As a result, Zone 7 is participating in various <br />projects that would provide alternate water supplies or protect the existing delivery system <br />against threats. These projects include installing a pipeline system beneath the Delta, <br />desalinating brackish water (water with high salt content), reusing highly treated wastewater, <br />and participating in the construction of a new reservoir to store surplus water in wet years.”