My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
101723 REGULAR
>
17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2023 10:22:31 AM
Creation date
10/13/2023 9:40:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/17/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Section 2: Water Supply Options and Alternatives Water Supply Alternatives Study <br />2-6 <br />DRAFT for review purposes only. Use of contents on this sheet is subject to the limitations specified at the end of this document. <br />Water Supply Alternatives Study-Draft Report.docx <br />Alternative 2 (Reduced Baseline) is similar to the Baseline Project but involves adding treatment to <br />Well 8 only (and not Wells 5 and 6). The treatment facility would involve four treatment trains with <br />two vessels per train and a system peak design flow of 3,500 gpm from Well 8 (i.e., 2,300 gpm less <br />than Alternative 1). Compared to Alternative 1, this alternative requires the same improvements to <br />treated water distribution piping and a slightly larger booster pump station at Zone 7’s Turnout 4 <br />than that required for near-term infrastructure improvements to accommodate future demands <br />(Appendix E). <br />Alternative 3 (Two New City Wells) involves constructing two new wells, each assumed at 3,000 gpm <br />pumping capacity (i.e., total 6,000 gpm), west of the existing PFAS plume. For the purposes of <br />bracketing this concept, this alternative assumes one new well in Del Prado Park and one new well in <br />Bernal Park, as shown in Figure 2-3. New well construction would be comparable to the City’s <br />existing wells and include drilling groundwater layers 6 through 9 or 10 at a boring depth of 685 feet <br />(ft) and screening from 150 ft to 650 ft. Compared to Alternatives 1 and 2, this alternative requires <br />more improvements to treated water distribution piping but a slightly smaller booster pump station <br />at Zone 7’s Turnout 4 (Appendix E). <br />Figure 2-3. Alternative 3 (two new wells) overview
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.