My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
091923 SPECIAL
>
13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2023 2:30:51 PM
Creation date
9/13/2023 2:25:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/19/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
13 PUBLIC COMMENTS
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2023\091923 SPECIAL
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The COS analysis and resulting water rates are developed using the principles established by the American Water <br /> Works Association's(AWWA)Principles of Water Rates,Fees, and Charges, 7h edition(M1 Manual). The water and <br /> recycled water rates developed in this Study were designed based on the industry standard Base-Extra Capacity <br /> methodology and the legal requirements set forth in the following section. This methodology allocates costs <br /> consistent with demand patterns of each customer class and for tiered rates, the demand patterns of each tier. <br /> 1.�. Legal Framework, <br /> 1.5.1.CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION - ARTICLE XIII D, SECTION 6 (PROPOSITION <br /> 218) <br /> Proposition 218 was enacted by voters in 1996 to ensure, in part, that fees and charges imposed for ongoing <br /> delivery of a service to a property(property-related fees and charges)are proportional to,and do not exceed,the <br /> cost of providing service.Water service fees and charges are property-related fees and charges subject to the <br /> provisions of California Constitution Article XIII D, Section 6(Proposition 218).The principal requirements,as <br /> they relate to public water service fees and charges are as follows: <br /> 1. Revenues derived from the fee or charge shall not exceed the costs required to provide the property-related <br /> service. <br /> 2. Revenues derived by the fee or charge shall not be used for any purpose other than that for which the fee or <br /> charge was imposed. <br /> 3. The amount of the fee or charge imposed upon any parcel shall not exceed the proportional cost of service <br /> attributable to the parcel. <br /> 4. No fee or charge may be imposed for a service unless that service is actually used or immediately available <br /> to the owner of property. <br /> 5. A written notice of the proposed fee or charge shall be mailed to the record owner of each parcel not less <br /> than 45 days prior to a public hearing,when the agency considers all written protests against the charge. <br /> As stated in the M1 Manual, "water rates and charges should be recovered from classes of customers in proportion <br /> to the cost of serving those customers."Raftelis follows industry standard rate setting methodologies set forth by <br /> the AWWA M1 Manual to ensure that the results of this Study align with Proposition 218 requirements and create <br /> rates that do not exceed the proportionate cost of providing water service. <br /> 1.5.2.CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION -ARTICLE X, SECTION 2 <br /> Article X, Section 2 of the California Constitution states the following: <br /> "It is hereby declared that because of the conditions prevailing in this State the general welfare requires that <br /> the water resources of the State be put to beneficial use to the fullest extent of which they are capable, and that <br /> the waste or unreasonable use or unreasonable method of use of water be prevented, and that the conservation <br /> ofsuch waters is to be exercised with a view to the reasonable and beneficial use thereof in the interest of the <br /> people and for the public welfare." <br /> 1 Raftelis does not practice law,nor does it provide legal advice.The above discussion provides a general overview of <br /> Raftelis'understanding as rate practitioners and is labeled"legal framework"for literary convenience only.The City <br /> should consult with its legal counsel for clarification and/or specific guidance. <br /> WATER AND RECYCLED WATER RATE STUDY REPORT 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.