My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
091923 SPECIAL
>
06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2023 2:14:27 PM
Creation date
9/13/2023 2:11:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/19/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Starting the week of August 15, 2022, the contractor notified the neighbors about the <br /> construction (he gave us the names and phone information). The contractor said nobody <br /> complained or raised concerns at the time and so the concrete slab was installed. <br /> However, we were subsequently contacted by the Code Enforcement Officer. <br /> The officer, acting on a neighbor's complaint, asked if we were building an accessory unit. <br /> On being told it was a tennis court, he mentioned no objectionable code violations and <br /> did recommend we contact the planning department for the next steps. <br /> My email of August 22, 2022 and the reply by the Planner on Duty, Eric Luchini, on the <br /> same date are attached as Exhibit A. <br /> Mr Luchini's email was very clear: <br /> "Thanks for your inquiry. The tennis court would not require any Planning <br /> review or permits. The same for the 10-foot-high fence from a Planning <br /> perspective, but again it cannot exceed 10 feet at any point. A Building permit <br /> would be require for the fence. <br /> Regarding the lights, if they exceed 10 feet in height, they would be required <br /> to go through Administrative Design Review with the Planning Division first and <br /> then obtain Building Permits. I have attached the submittal requirements and <br /> application for the Administrative Design Review process." <br /> We conformed to the conditions explained by Mr Luchini, i.e.10 feet on the fence height <br /> (which does not require planning approval) and to file for an Administrative Design Review <br /> for lights if we wanted to install them at 12 ft height. <br /> The fence posts that have been installed are 10 feet high, and while we do not have <br /> current plans for lights, back then the ADR Application for installing lights was filed by our <br /> contractor in November 2022. On November 9th, 2022 our contractor received an email <br /> response from Mr. Diego that is attached in Exhibit B <br /> Mr. Diego's email stated that our ADR application was incomplete, and it needed more <br /> information. The email instructed: <br /> "The property is zoned PUD-LDR and subject to the R-1-20,000 development <br /> standards. Per the R-1-20,000 standards, accessory structures are required to <br /> be setback 5-feet from the rear setback line and 3-feet from the side property <br /> line (see Table 18.84.010). Please label setbacks of the proposed light poles to <br /> property lines accordingly." <br /> We have since decided not to install the lights. However, this email provided us with <br /> setbacks we should propose in case we wanted to install 12 ft high lights. <br /> Page 3 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.