My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
091923 SPECIAL
>
06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2023 2:14:27 PM
Creation date
9/13/2023 2:11:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/19/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
T'hc applicanLs were invited to make final comments, but declined the opportunity. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> Commissioner Kanteny noted that he had no problem with the project pvr se, and noted <br /> that he visited the site. lie agreed that the comer was very difficult, and would be inclined <br /> to include the same utter of dedication on Dennis Drive as was done for Martin Avenue. <br /> In that case, it would be funded for the City. and the improvements would not be done <br /> until the development of the houses. <br /> Commissioner Maas believed the Dennis Drive issue watt separate from this application <br /> Commissioner K uneny disagreed with that assessment. because the applicants had <br /> property frontage on the street. He noted that it was normal subdivision procedure to <br /> dedicate the street frontage to the City or the agency. <br /> Commissioner Maas believed that the Dennis Drive issue was bigger than the application, <br /> and should be examined separately. She noted that she would like to hear from the Traffic <br /> Division before any widening of the street was addressed. She did not have any problem <br /> with the project,and believed that the design should blend with the other homes. She did <br /> not know whether widening the street would increase speeding,and did not want to give <br /> a false sense of security to children walking to school. <br /> Commissioner Roberts believed that the sidewalk should not be built on the Petersons' <br /> side of the street, and noted that the road widening is a different issue. She believed that <br /> the money should be set aside for the widening of the road, and that the details could be <br /> settled at a later time. She agreed that the Traffic and Engineering Divisions should be <br /> included in the process. She believed that the road must be improved, and did not want to <br /> hold the application up because of that issue. <br /> Commissioner Kameny noted that the two choices were for the applicant to widen the <br /> road now or not to widen the road and have the applicant give the offer of dedication and <br /> money to the City to widen the road when the adjacent properties are developed. If the <br /> City does not wi e road t e would be refunded to the applicant. <br /> Mr. lserson concurred with Commissioner Karneny's analysis of the options. <br /> Commissioner Maas could not agree to widening Dennis Drive without the input from <br /> the Traffic Division. <br /> Mr. Iserson confirmed that the Traffic Division stated that the road widening would <br /> improve traffic conditions. <br /> Commissioner Maas noted that she liked the road as it currently exists, and did not <br /> believe that every road must be widened. <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 2S. 2003 Page 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.