Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT 2 <br /> THE CITY OF Planning Commission <br /> I/llt� M11 <br /> Agenda Report <br /> 9YR �n Itl : IN r1� <br /> L E ASA V1 ON® August 23Item26 <br /> SUBJECT: PUD-148 <br /> APPLICANT/ <br /> PROPERTY OWNERS: Meenu Gochhwal & Ashish Choudhary <br /> PURPOSE: Application for Planned Unit Development (PUD) development plan <br /> approval to establish development standards. <br /> LOCATION: 2207 Martin Avenue <br /> GENERAL PLAN: Low Density Residential <br /> ZONING: PUD-LDR (Planned Unit Development — Low Density Residential) <br /> EXHIBITS: A. Resolution and Draft Conditions of Approval <br /> B. Project Plans dated "Received June 17, 2023" <br /> C. Public Comments <br /> D. Location and Notification Map <br /> STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution recommending <br /> approval of PUD-148 to the City Council, based on the required findings and subject to the <br /> draft Conditions of Approval in Exhibit A. <br /> EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> The proposed project would establish development standards for the subject parcel, which <br /> includes an existing single-family residence constructed prior to the parcel's annexation into <br /> the City of Pleasanton in 1997. While PUD zoning was adopted for the entire annexation area <br /> in 1997, the prior approvals did not establish specific development standards for the residence <br /> or any ancillary structures via a PUD development plan. The Pleasanton Municipal Code <br /> (PMC) Chapter 18.68.050 restricts development of a site within a planned unit development <br /> district until all provision of chapter 18.68 have been completed, which includes a development <br /> plan. In addition, the absence of an approved PUD development plan for the subject parcel <br /> has precluded staff from providing guidance to the applicant/property owners for additional <br /> development on the subject parcel. The applicant/property owners are requesting approval of a <br /> PUD development plan to establish development standards for the subject parcel, including <br /> addition of site specific standards for sports courts. This application reference to an existing <br /> partially-built sports court constructed without City approvals and currently conflicts with <br /> aspects of staff's recommendations related to the proposed development standards for the <br /> subject parcel, and as explained in more detail later in this report. As conditioned, staff finds <br /> the proposed development standards would be consistent with the objectives of the General <br />