06 - Laserfiche WebLink

As detailed in the report, staff and the commission concluded the proposed development standards are consistent with the General Plan and Zoning for the subject parcel, and other developments in the vicinity. Although concerns were raised by some neighbors with respects to visual impacts of the tennis court fence, tennis balls going into private property, and potential lighting, the recommended modified conditions of approval have been added. PUBLIC NOTICE Notice of this application was sent to surrounding property owners and tenants within a 1,000-foot radius of the site and published in the newspaper. The noticing map is included as Attachment 4. At the time this report was published, staff has not received any public comments. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Environmental review for the proposed project was undertaken with the Initial Study/Negative Declaration adopted by the City Council for RZ-97-2 in conformance with the standards of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). There are not substantial changes to the project or the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or that substantially increase the severity of previously identified effects. Furthermore, there is no new information of substantial importance which was unknown at the time the Initial Study/Negative Declaration was adopted by the City Council regarding the project or its effects, mitigation measures, or alternatives. Any previously identified effects or impacts are mitigated to a level of insignificance, with the mitigation measures incorporated into the project's design or imposed on the project pursuant to the conditions of approval. Therefore, no new environmental document accompanies this agenda report. CONCLUSION The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed development standards and as modified and conditioned, believes they are consistent with the General Plan and Zoning for the subject parcel and consistent with other development requirements in the vicinity. Therefore, the project, as conditioned, merits a favorable recommendation by the Planning Commission. Submitted by: Approved by: Ellen Clark Gerry Beaudin Director of Community Development City Manager Attachments: 1. Draft Ordinance for PUD Development Plan (PUD-148) 2. Planning Commission Agenda Report with Exhibits 3. August 23, 2023 Planning Commission Draft Minute Excerpt 4. Location and Notification Map Page 10 of 10