Laserfiche WebLink
• Existing <br /> • Existing plus project <br /> • Existing plus background (approved &pending projects) <br /> • Existing plus background plus project <br /> • Cumulative <br /> • Cumulative plus project <br /> d. Calculate daily forecasts on Dublin Canyon Road for above scenarios <br /> 3. Site circulation and related issues <br /> a. Evaluate pedestrian, bicycle and transit impacts related to the project. <br /> b. Evaluate adequacy of circulation and parking for residential site and EBRP staging area. <br /> c. Provide conceptual recommendations for striping and signing along Dublin Canyon Road <br /> near the project. Indicate where, if any, pavement widening is required to accommodate any <br /> revised striping.Consider both project traffic issues and collision history in the area. <br /> d. Determine project-related VMT. <br /> 4. Report <br /> a. Using City of Pleasanton significance criteria,determine any significant impacts and appropriate <br /> mitigation measures.Identify Project fair share requirements for mitigation measures. <br /> b. Prepare administrative draft free-standing traffic impact study for project <br /> c. After receiving comments, prepare final traffic study for project <br /> d. Provide any requested review and comments on CEQA document traffic section prepared by <br /> others. <br /> e. Respond to CEQA document comments T&M basis. <br /> Cumulative Effects <br /> In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15130,the EIR will address the cumulative effects of the <br /> proposed project in combination with other projects.As set forth in the CEQA Guidelines,the cumulative <br /> analysis will focus on impacts to which the project has made a significant incremental contribution.The <br /> analysis will reflect the severity of the impacts and their likelihood of occurrence,and will be guided by <br /> standards of practicality and reasonableness. <br /> Alternatives <br /> Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6,the EIR will evaluate a range of feasible alternatives to the <br /> proposed project.One of the alternatives will be the CEQA-mandated "No Project Alternative," which is <br /> the circumstance under which the project does not proceed. FCS will evaluate up to two additional <br /> alternatives, likely consisting of a reduction in project site or potentially a refinement of proposed <br /> residential lot locations to better comply with City policies. In addition,the Alternatives section will <br /> address the feasibility of an alternative location,as well as any alternatives that were initially considered <br /> but rejected from further consideration. <br /> NORTH AMFRICA i FUROPE(AFRICA f AUSTRAL IA{ASIA <br /> FIRSTCARBONSOLUTIONS.COM <br />