Laserfiche WebLink
3.05 Water Related Impacts (Runoff, Flood Hazard, Quality and Quantity of Surface <br /> and Ground Waters) (Cont.): <br /> <br />A contained and covered area would be created on the site for the storage of bags, <br />cement, paints, oils, fertilizers, pesticides, or other materials used that have the po- <br />tential of being discharged into the storm drain system through being windblown <br />or in the event of a material spill. <br /> <br />Machinery, equipment, tools, brushes, or rinse containers would be prohibited <br />from being cleaned into a street, gutter, or storm drain. <br /> <br />Concrete/gunite supply trucks or concrete/plaster operations would be prohibited <br />from discharging wash water into street, gutters, or storm drains. <br /> <br />The flood hazard maps of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) indicate <br />that the project site is not located within a flood prone area. <br /> <br /> May be <br />Significant <br /> <br />X <br /> <br />Insignificant <br /> <br />Insignificant <br />if Mitigated <br /> <br />3.06 Plant and Animal Impacts (Effect on Existing Ecosystem, Rare or Endangered Spe- <br /> cies, Etc.): <br /> <br />The subject property is a relatively flat site in an urbanized area of the City. No threat- <br />ened and/or endangered species of flora and fauna are known to inhabit the site. <br /> <br />May be <br />Significant <br /> <br />X <br /> <br />Insignificant <br /> <br />Insignificant <br />if Mitigated <br /> <br />3.07 Transportation/Circulation Impacts (Additional Traffic, Congestion, parking, Haz- <br /> ards, etc.): <br /> <br />The project's traffic study projects the project to have peak-hour trips as follows: 65 in- <br />bound/63 outbound for the a.m. peak hour and 79 inbound/79 outbound for the p.m. peak <br />hour. <br /> <br />It further found that the majority of the above trips are "pass-by" trips which are already <br />present at the nearby intersections and would have no impact on those intersections. The <br />remainder - new and diverted trips - would not cause service levels to change at the <br />36 studied intersections and would account for less than one percent of total traffic at <br />these intersections. Many of the intersections which have project-related trips, however, <br /> <br />SR:04:265 October 19, 2004 <br />Page 4 of 8 Exhibit "B ", Initial Study/Negative Declaration <br /> <br /> <br />