My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
2
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2023
>
08-23_SPECIAL
>
2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2023 10:31:06 AM
Creation date
8/16/2023 10:27:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
8/23/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
2_Exhibit A
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\08-23_SPECIAL
2_Exhibit B
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\08-23_SPECIAL
2_Exhibit C
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\08-23_SPECIAL
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
P23-0389; 6668 Owens Drive Planning Commission <br />5 of 7 <br />STAFF REVIEW/ANALYSIS <br />Conditional uses are those uses which, by their nature, require special consideration so they <br />may be located properly with respect to the objectives of the Pleasanton Municipal Code and <br />with respect to their effects on surrounding properties. To achieve these purposes, the <br />Planning Commission is empowered to approve, conditionally approve, or deny applications <br />for CUP’s. <br /> <br />Land Use <br />One of the primary concerns in reviewing a CUP application is the effect of the proposed use <br />on surrounding uses. The Land Use Element of the General Plan designates the subject <br />property as “Business Park (Industrial / Commercial and Office).” The zoning for this site is <br />PUD-I/C-O (Planned Unit Development – Industrial/ Commercial – Office) which permits uses <br />such as light industrial, office, research, and development, and commercial, and requires CUP <br />approval for uses such as day care centers, tutoring facilities, and private schools. <br /> <br />When a proposed use is educational, instructional, recreational, or daycare, staff evaluates <br />whether the use is compatible with surrounding uses. In this case, the proposed instructional <br />facility is located adjacent to office uses. Given the office-like activities of the proposed use, it <br />is unlikely the operation of the proposed use would adversely impact the surrounding <br />businesses. Since students typically would be dropped off before classes and be picked up <br />after classes, it is unlikely they would congregate outside or otherwise impact the operation of <br />other tenants in the building or in the vicinity. Additionally, a staff member will be on site during <br />operational hours to provide needed and necessary supervision, as stated by the applicant in <br />Exhibit B. <br /> <br />In staff’s evaluation, this use is compatible with the surrounding uses. In the past, the Planning <br />Commission has granted CUPs for private schools and tutoring facilities in business parks <br />(e.g., a private school at 6691 Owens Drive under P21-1043 and a social vocational service <br />facility at 6602 Owens Drive under P15-0008). The subject building is a freestanding building <br />located on a site that has adequate on-site parking and the instructional facility would be <br />operated entirely indoors. Staff believes the subject location is appropriate and does not <br />expect the proposed use would create adverse impacts on existing and future surrounding <br />businesses. <br /> <br />Should future problems arise, the City would have the ability to bring the application back to <br />the Planning Commission for mitigation, or possible revocation, if necessary. Based on past <br />experience with similar uses, staff feels this outcome would be unlikely if operated in a <br />professional manner. In addition, staff has included conditions of approval that will ensure the <br />surrounding uses are not impacted due to noise, parking, traffic, or other objectionable <br />influences. Therefore, from a land use perspective, staff finds the use to be acceptable on the <br />subject property, as conditioned. <br /> <br />Traffic and Circulation <br />The proposal has been reviewed by the Traffic Engineering Division to assess potential traffic <br />issues during peak commute hours. Staff has determined the proposed use would not have a <br />significant impact on existing traffic levels. However, should the applicant wish to modify the <br />operation as stated in its narrative, review by the City’s Traffic Engineer would be required to <br />assess whether traffic analysis would be required and/or whether payment of traffic fees and <br />implementation of mitigation measures would be warranted. Additionally, the Traffic <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.