My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
5
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2023
>
08-23_SPECIAL
>
5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2023 10:31:38 AM
Creation date
8/16/2023 10:26:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
8/23/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
5_Exhibit A
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\08-23_SPECIAL
5_Exhibit B
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\08-23_SPECIAL
5_Exhibit C
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\08-23_SPECIAL
5_Exhibit D
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\08-23_SPECIAL
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
P19-0379, 1 Brozosky Hill Lane Planning Commission <br />Figure 4: Proposed “Blob” Relocation <br /> <br />Analysis <br />There have been prior discussions with the Planning Commission concerning “blobs” and <br />future home sites, on other sites within the VACSP area. <br /> <br />In October 2005, the Planning Commission reviewed a development on Lot 27 of VACSP <br />(PUD-32/Sarich). In discussion of whether the Specific Plan requires the proposed home <br />to be built precisely on the “blob” shown on the land use plan or whether there was <br />flexibility with respect to interpretation of the Specific Plan, there was consensus among <br />the Commissioners that there could be flexibility considered in the siting of the future lots <br />and the proposed home did not need to be located precisely on the “blob” shown on the <br />land use plan (underline added). The City Council concurred with the Commission’s <br />discussion. As such, developments, such as Sarich, Resnick (Lot 25/PUD-54) and <br />Berlogar (Lot 22/PUD-84), requested and received approvals to have new home sites <br />stray from the location of the illustrative "blobs” in order to achieve a superior hillside <br />development. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.