My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
2
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2023
>
06-14
>
2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/7/2023 3:45:47 PM
Creation date
6/7/2023 3:37:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/14/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
2_EXHIBIT A
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\06-14
2_Exhibit B
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\06-14
2_Exhibit C
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\06-14
Text box
ID:
1
Creator:
PLAN1
Created:
6/7/2023 3:37 PM
Modified:
6/7/2023 3:37 PM
Text:
mailto:jsoo@cityofpleasantonca.gov
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
P23-0338, 11300 Dublin Canyon Road Planning Commission <br />6 of 6 <br />(EIR) prepared for the Pleasanton 2005-2025 General Plan, certified in July 2009 which was <br />adopted and certified by the City Council in 2009 under City Counc il Resolution No. 09-312. In <br />order to provide additional project-level analysis, the applicant provided an additional Arborist <br />Report/Tree, Biological Resources Analysis, Geotechnical Investigation, Noise Assessment <br />Study, and Health Risk Assessment Memorandum. The assessments identified measures <br />sufficient to reduce project impacts to a less-than-significant level, and these measures are <br />incorporated as conditions of approval. In addition, the technical studies identified no new <br />information or changed circumstances that would require supplemental environmental review <br />and is consistent with the previously approved EIR and that it is adequate to serve as the <br />environmental documentation for this Project and satisfy all the requirements of the CEQA and <br />therefore confirms that no further environmental review is required. <br /> <br />SUMMARY/CONCLUSION <br />With the operational program remaining unchanged, the request is essentially for a time <br />extension on the original approval so the applicant can prepare for building permit submittal. <br />With the request to complete the CAP 2.0 checklist to ensure the overall project’s compliance <br />to the recently adopted CAP 2.0, staff finds the project and operation would continue to meet <br />the intent of the underlying zoning regulations. Staff finds the request is supported, and <br />recommends approval of the project, subject to the Conditions of Approval listed in Exhibit A., <br />which are identical to those of the prior approval, with the addition of the above -noted condition <br />related to compliance with CAP 2.0. <br /> <br />Primary Authors: Jenny Soo, Associate Planner, 925-931-5615 or jsoo@cityofpleasantonca.gov. <br /> <br />Reviewed/Approved By: <br />Melinda Denis, Planning and Permit Center Manager <br />Ellen Clark, Director of Community Development <br />Julie Harryman, Assistant City Attorney
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.