Laserfiche WebLink
LIVEIW@RE <br /> CALIFORNI COMMENT COMPILATION AND RESPONSE <br /> C101 Section#2 <br /> Page#7 <br /> Comment: Increase the communication with and input from the public during the RFQ/RFP process <br /> without a public records request. <br /> R101 See R4 <br /> Comment noted.No specific alternative language or deletions provided. <br /> C102 Section#3 <br /> Page#7 <br /> Comment: Increase the communication with and input from the public during the RFQ/RFP process <br /> without a public records request. <br /> R102 See R4 <br /> Comment noted.No specific alternative language or deletions provided. <br /> C103 Section#3 <br /> Page# 10 <br /> Comment: Leaded gasoline is harmful to the people,animal and the environment. Regulate,reduce and <br /> eliminate lead fuel. <br /> R103 Comment noted.No specific alternative language or deletions provided. <br /> C104 Section#3 <br /> Page# 12 <br /> Comment: Appreciate emphasis on protecting water resources. Who will be responsible for the <br /> protections? <br /> R104 The City's Planning Department will ensure compliance with Legal Requirements related to water <br /> quality. <br /> Comment noted.No specific alternative language or deletions provided. <br /> Commenter#26 <br /> C105 Section#2.6;3.2; 7.5 <br /> Page#7,9,34 <br /> Comment:My concerns are in agreement with the Livermore Airport Citizen's Group. <br /> R105 Comment noted.No specific alternative language or deletions provided. <br /> Commenter#27 <br /> C106 Comment: As a resident that would be impacted by any changes proposed to the operation of the airport, <br /> why was I not contacted proactively to solicit my input? You should have a robust public <br /> information/outreach campaign.What are the noise impacts that are reasonably foreseeable from this new <br /> policy? Why are you not conforming to previous Resolutions adopted by the City regarding airport <br /> developments? Local government should be about openly serving the needs of its residents, not hiding <br /> major impacts to them until it is too late to do anything about it.Whose need are your really serving?: <br /> R106 See R7 <br /> Comment noted.No specific alternative language or deletions provided. <br /> Commenter#28 <br /> C107 Section#2,6 <br /> Page# <br /> Comment: Why is there no mention of when the public can comment on applications except at a City <br /> Council meeting at the very end of the process?The public must be notified and allowed to comment at <br /> every step of the process:interest,MOU,Concept Plan,etc.All information should be provided publicly <br /> and in a timely manner for all stages excluding financial information.The public should be able to receive <br /> feedback concerning comments.The 2.6 Public Disclosure section needs to be re-written to include the <br /> above conditions. Giving the public the chance to review documents after making a request under the <br /> California Public Records Act is insufficient and denies adequate access to critical information. <br /> R107 See R4 <br /> Comment noted.No specific alternative language or deletions provided. <br /> Comment Compilation and Response 21 <br /> City of Livermore, Livermore Municipal Airport(06/05/2023) <br />