My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
21
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
060623
>
21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2023 1:00:38 PM
Creation date
5/31/2023 4:43:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/6/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
21 SUPPLEMENTAL
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2023\060623
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT C <br /> THE CITY OF <br /> PLEASANTON. <br /> April 7,2023 <br /> Ms. Marianna Marysheva <br /> City Manager <br /> City of Livermore <br /> 1052 S. Livermore Avenue <br /> Livermore, CA 94550-1052 <br /> Via email: mmaryshet-ti u�livermoreca._Qor <br /> RE: City of Pleasanton Comments on the Airport Development Policy and Hanger <br /> Waitlist Policy <br /> Dear Marianna— <br /> Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the City of Livermore's(Livermore) <br /> Draft Airport Development Policy and Hangar Waitlist Policy. Please find below the City of <br /> Pleasanton's comments regarding the draft policies. As you are aware, Pleasanton and public <br /> concerns are most focused on expansion of airport activity and noise etc. associated with flight <br /> activity that may occur with such expansions. As such, it is important that Livermore's policies <br /> continue to adhere to the limitations established in Resolution 2010-058,and that there is <br /> transparency and appropriate analysis of any project with the potential to increase flight activity. <br /> While we appreciate the more detailed and comprehensive planning and approval approach <br /> reflected in the policies,the City of Pleasanton(Pleasanton) is concerned that the policies do not <br /> adequately utilize or reflect the 2010 Livermore City Council Resolution as it relates to <br /> expansion of airport activities and associated impacts, nor thoroughly articulate how the public <br /> and interested parties will be provided notification of major improvements or other planned <br /> expansion. <br /> Pleasanton's specific comments of the Draft Policies are as follows: <br /> 1. The Draft Policy does not adequately tie the basis or rationale for approval of improvements <br /> to the specific parameters outlined in Resolution 2010-058. As you are aware,the Resolution <br /> generally seeks to limit the expansion of airport operations and additional flight activity,base <br /> any expansion solely on the basis of existing demand and"tangible evidence"thereto;to <br /> control noise, and more specifically, to limit certain expansions such as the extension of <br /> runways or development of large air-cargo operations. <br /> 2. In Section 1.2,the bullet list of objectives used to evaluate proposals is deemed to "reflect the <br /> Airport Development Priorities" in Reso 2010-058. It further notes they will be"used as <br /> criteria for evaluating proposals for Airport land lease/development, as further explained in <br /> P.O. Box 520,Pleasanton,CA 94566-0802 123 Main Street <br /> City Manager City Attorney Economic Development City Clerk <br /> (925)931-5002 (925)931-5015 (925)931-5038 (925)931-5027 <br /> Fax: 931-5482 Fax: 931-5482 Fax: 931-5485 Fax: 931-5492 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.