My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
060623
>
04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/31/2023 4:18:44 PM
Creation date
5/31/2023 4:18:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/6/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> 3. Safety and A. Is the Project on a known ❑ <br /> Comfort High Injury Network (HIN) or <br /> has a local traffic safety <br /> analysis found a high <br /> incidence of bicyclist/ <br /> pedestrian-involved crashes <br /> within the project area? <br /> B. Does the project seek to ® n The projects will include <br /> improve bicyclist and/or bicycle and pedestrian <br /> pedestrian conditions? If the enhancements such as <br /> project includes a bikeway, protected bike lanes and <br /> was a Level of Traffic Stress decreased pedestrian <br /> (LTS), or similar user crossings. LTS levels <br /> experience analyses were reported in the <br /> conducted? 2018 PBMP. <br /> 4. Transit A. Are there existing public ® List transit facilities <br /> Coordination transit facilities (stop or (stop, station, or route) <br /> station) in the project area? and all affected <br /> agencies. <br /> B. Have all potentially affected ❑ 0 Please provide <br /> transit agencies had the confirmation email from <br /> opportunity to review this transit operator(s). <br /> project? <br /> C. Is there a MTC Mobility Hub ® If yes, please describe <br /> within the project area? outreach to mobility <br /> providers, and Project's <br /> Hub-supportive <br /> elements. <br /> 5. Design Does the project meet ® n The protected and <br /> professional design standards or buffered class II bike <br /> guidelines appropriate for bicycle lanes have a minimum <br /> and/or pedestrian facilities? width of 6 foot bike lanes <br /> and 2 foot buffers. <br /> 6. Equity Will Project improve active NO Please list EPC(s) <br /> transportation in an Equity affected. <br /> Priority Community? <br /> 7. BPAC Has a local (city or county) ❑ ® The complete streets <br /> Review Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory checklist will be <br /> Commission (BPAC) reviewed reviewed at the City's <br /> this checklist (or for OBAG 3, BPTC on June 26, 2023. <br /> this project)? <br /> Page 3 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.