My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 04066
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
RES 04066
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2004 3:19:44 PM
Creation date
10/19/2004 3:18:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/7/2004
DOCUMENT NO
RES 04-066
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Resolution No. 04-066 <br />Page Three <br /> <br />Sloping Plane Variance. As stated above, if the applicants' lot width <br />met the minimum RM-4,000 district standard of 70 feet, the sloping <br />plan setback variance would not be needed. Additionally, sloping <br />plane setback variances were granted to 4319 Second Street and <br />4377 Second Street, both of which have the same lot dimensions as <br />the subject: lot. Therefore, this finding for the sloping plane setback <br />variance can be made. <br /> <br />Height Variance. Generally, the architectural style of the existing <br />detached two-story structure matches and complements the design of <br />the existing residence on the site. In the past, variances were granted <br />for both one-story and two-story detached structures in the <br />Downtown area so that the roof pitch of the structure could match <br />that of the main residence. In these cases, the Downtown <br />neighborhood was found to be unique and the detached structure's <br />roof would match that of the main structure and be in keeping with <br />the character of the area. The height variance for the existing <br />25-foot high structure is the result of matching the historic design <br />and roof pitch of the applicants' home. The strict application of the <br />height requirement would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed <br />by other property owners in the same neighborhood and zoning <br />district, and, therefore, this finding for the height variance can be <br />made. <br /> <br />Granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special <br />privilege inconsistent with the limitation on other properties <br />classified in the same zoning district. <br /> <br />In order for this finding to be made, there must exist a relationship <br />between the unique characteristic of the lot and the requested <br />variances. <br /> <br />Setback variance. The property's historic Downtown location is <br />unique. As mentioned above, several variances have been granted in <br />the Downtown area for detached accessory structures located closer <br />to the side and rear property lines than what are required by the <br />zoning district. In these cases, the lots were substandard in lot <br />dimensions and/or lot area. Therefore, this finding for the setback <br />variances can be made. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.