Laserfiche WebLink
Objective Desian Standards for Housina Sites <br /> unless the planning commission elects to review the decision of the zoning administrator, or city council <br /> elects to review the decision of the commission,the decision shall be effective on the later of the <br /> following: <br /> a. The day following the first meeting of the planning commission or city council after the body <br /> has received notice of the decision;or <br /> b. The day after the expiration of the appeal period. <br /> 5.Reviews and Appeals <br /> a. Any review or appeal shall follow the procedures outlined in Section 18.144.020 of the PMC. <br /> b. Any person and/or any member of the city council may appeal or review, as applicable,any <br /> decision of the planning commission to the city council. <br /> c. Any person may appeal an action of the zoning administrator to the planning commission.Any <br /> appeal to the planning commission may be further appealed or brought for review to the city <br /> council.Any member of the planning commission and/or city council may seek review of an <br /> action of the zoning administrator to the planning commission or the city council,respectively. <br /> Appeals or review to the planning commission or council governed by this title shall be de novo <br /> appeals or reviews. <br /> 6. Modification to Approved Project <br /> The Director of Community Development shall determine if any change(s)requested by an applicant to <br /> an approved project and/or conditions thereto is minor or major. <br /> A. Minor. If,after review of the project and conditions,the director determines that the requested <br /> change is a minor revision or change,the director,after consulting with the city attorney and city <br /> engineer,shall review the requested change for compliance with applicable objective design standards <br /> and related environmental mitigation measures. If in compliance,the director shall approve the minor <br /> requested change. If not in compliance, conditions may be imposed to achieve compliance,or the minor <br /> requested change may be denied. <br /> B. Major. If,after review of the project and conditions,the director determines that the requested <br /> change is a major or a substantial revision or change,the requested change shall be presented: i)to the <br /> Zoning Administrator if made to a project with 50 or fewer units exclusive of ADUs/JADUs; or ii)to the <br /> planning commission if made to a project with 51 or more units exclusive of ADUs/JADUs.The <br /> reviewing body shall review the change for compliance with applicable objective design standards and <br /> related environmental mitigation measures. If the requested change is in compliance,the zoning <br /> administrator or planning commission,as applicable, shall approve the requested change. If the <br /> requested change does not comply,conditions may be imposed to achieve compliance,or the requested <br /> change may be denied. <br /> 7. Lapse of Approval <br /> Compliance review shall lapse and shall be void two years following the effective date of approval,or if <br /> a subdivision is approved in conjunction with the project,two years following the subdivision approval, <br /> whichever is later,unless prior to expiration a building permit is issued and construction is commenced <br /> and diligently pursued to completion,or the applicant has filed a request for an approval extension <br /> pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.12.030 of the PMC. <br /> The above procedures and the strict application of the Objective Design Standards shall not apply to <br /> projects or sites for which legislative action,such as annexation, is required,with such projects subject to <br /> the City's standard PUD process/procedures. <br /> City of Pleasanton -10- Adopted May 2, 2023 <br />