My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
5_Exhibit B_Resolution_Attachment 2
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2023
>
05-10
>
5_Exhibit B_Resolution_Attachment 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/4/2023 3:15:58 PM
Creation date
5/4/2023 3:12:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/10/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
5
(Superseded by)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\05-10
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
541
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Housing Element Community Survey Summary <br />29 <br />In terms of new housing types, there was considerable support for higher density housing types such <br />as condos and townhomes, as well as for smaller scale multi-family housing types such as duplexes <br />and triplexes. Many respondents favored mixed use development (housing in conjunction with <br />commercial uses), and expressed support for housing that provides convenient amenities and <br />services. That said, many respondents indicated that single-family homes should remain important as <br />part of the future housing supply, reflective of Pleasanton’s existing character and housing stock. <br />When asked about specific locations throughout the city where housing would be most appropriate, <br />the greatest majority of respondents indicated that an emphasis to place new housing near transit, <br />specifically BART, should be encouraged. Placing housing near services and amenities was also <br />supported by many. Specific locations that were clearly favored by a high proportion of respondents <br />included Stoneridge Mall and Hacienda Business Park with a focus on underutilized and outdated <br />commercial and office developments. After Stoneridge Mall and Hacienda, a sizable number of <br />respondents also indicated that planning for East Pleasanton should be considered for future housing. <br />A consistent theme for where not to put housing, was within existing neighborhoods; a number of <br />responses also indicated that downtown was not a preferred location for new housing. Respondents <br />felt that existing residents and neighborhoods should be protected to the greatest degree possible <br />from future development including placing development on the outskirts or along freeways that <br />would not contribute as greatly to traffic within the center of the city. <br />In terms of programs and actions that could be taken by the City, efforts to ensure high quality, <br />creatively designed mixed use projects, and to streamline and simplify permit processes were the <br />most supported types of actions. However, at least a quarter of respondents favored many of the other <br />program ideas mentioned, suggesting that a broad range of policy strategies could be supported as the <br />City works to identify a range of feasible programs and actions to support community housing needs. <br />Mitigating impacts of future housing and development was also a major theme throughout the <br />survey, with the most common concerns and question around water supply and schools. <br />Overcrowding and additional traffic impacts for current residents were also commonly brought up <br />throughout the survey. Most respondents urged the City to cautiously consider all impacts and plan <br />future infrastructure improvements appropriately to account for all future housing. <br />For a more detailed summary of open-ended questions, please go to https://bit.ly/HEUSurveyResults <br />Public Participation Summaries City of Pleasanton | E-89
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.