5_Exhibit B_Resolution_Attachment 2

D-6 | City of Pleasanton Existing Programs Review Table D-1: Existing Housing Element Programs Review Program # Program Objectives Responsible Party Evaluation Modify / Delete / Continue very low-income households, such as State HELP funds, the availability of these funds will be promoted through the City’s web site, in local newspapers, and through posting at public places subject to normal procedures. Kottinger Gardens Phase 2 (completed in 2019), and nearly $7.2 million for Sunflower Hill (completed in 2020). The City continues to monitor the availability of new funding sources for affordable housing and applies for funding as appropriate. 9.2 Seek creative alternative and non-traditional means, including using available City financial and property resources and working cooperatively with community groups, that will assist in the production of or preserve housing for extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate-income-households as well as special needs housing including housing for those with disabilities. - Planning Division, Housing Division The City continues to communicate with several groups, including MidPen Housing, Sunflower Hill and Tri- Valley REACH, which may lead to the development of new affordable housing within the next several years. Modify: Expand to reflect working cooperatively with other entities (e.g., faith- based property owners, etc.) 9.3 Advocate changes in Federal and State legislation to provide incentives for the development of housing for special needs and housing affordable to extremely low-, low- and very low-income households and to overcome barriers to housing affordable to low- and very low-income households. - Housing Commission, City Council The City continues to advocate Federal and State legislative changes and provides general support to legislative efforts on an ongoing basis. This is more appropriately framed as a policy. Delete: Retain as a policy. 10.1 Conduct a review of the Growth Management Program and amend as necessary to assure the rate of residential development, limited to 235 units per year consistent with the City’s Growth Management unit allocation, is consistent with the City’s current and new infrastructure capacities, including - City Council In 2015, Municipal Code Chapter 17.36 was amended to ensure that the Growth Management Ordinance does not include constraints including preventing the City from meeting its Modify: Revise to reflect that the Growth Management Program must comply with all requirements of the Housing Crisis Act (Senate Bill 330) while it is in effect, including