2 - Laserfiche WebLink

P23-0180, 1024 Serpentine Lane, Suite 101 Planning Commission 7 of 7 excess of 75 dBA at any point outside of the property plane as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Therefore, staff does not believe the proposed use would be disruptive to existing or future neighboring businesses/tenants or residences . Signage No signage is proposed at this time. If the applicant elects to add signage, the proposed signage would be required to adhere to Valley Business Park sign guidelines and the Municipal Code. Any deviations would require a separate Sign Design Review application to be submitted to the City for consideration. ALTERNATIVES As articulated above, staff believes the proposed use, as conditioned, is consistent with the objectives of the zoning district. However, alternatives that could be considered by the Planning Commission include: 1. Denial of the application. Such an action would preclude the applicant from operating the tutoring facility. 2. Approval of the CUP with modifications. The Planning Commission could approve the CUP, but with modified hours of operation and/or other changes to the proposal. Staff is able to support the findings to approve the project, as proposed, and believes the project will not adversely impact any existing on-site uses or the surrounding area; thus, staff suggests neither of the two project alternatives above should be pursued. PUBLIC NOTICE Notice of this application was sent to surrounding property owners and tenants within a 1,000-foot radius of the subject parcel and published in the newspaper. At the time this report was published, staff has not received any public comments. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT This project is categorically exempt (Section 15301, Class 1, Existing Facilities) from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Therefore, no environmental document accompanies this report. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION As proposed and conditioned, staff believes the proposed use would be compatible with the surrounding businesses and would not detrimentally affect the surrounding uses or residential properties. Conditions of approval have been included which would ensure that the safety and general welfare of the surrounding area, and the City in general, is maintained. Primary Author: Sachiko Riddle, Assistant Planner, 925-931-5607 or sriddle@cityofpleasantonca.gov. Reviewed/Approved By: Eric Luchini, Senior Planner Melinda Denis, Planning and Permit Center Manager Ellen Clark, Director of Community Development