My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
050223
>
14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2023 8:24:24 AM
Creation date
4/26/2023 8:24:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/2/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
THE , 11 r , I <br /> PLEASANTON. DRAFT 2023 Legislative Positions <br /> Bill # and Title Description Recommended TVC <br /> City Position Position/League <br /> Position <br /> funds to support regional coordination and expand or develop local <br /> capacity to address their immediate homelessness challenges <br /> informed by best-practices and to solve homelessness using <br /> evidence-based or, where no evidence exists, a data-informed and <br /> promising framework, as provided. <br /> 5 AB 821 The Planning and Zoning Law requires each county and city to Oppose unless None/Oppose <br /> (Grayson) adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical amended <br /> development of the county or city, and of certain land outside its <br /> Planning and boundaries. Current law requires that county or city zoning <br /> ordinances be consistent with the general plan of the county or city <br /> zoning: by January 1, 1974. Current law requires a zoning ordinance to be <br /> development project amended within a reasonable time so that it is consistent with the <br /> application. general plan in the event that the ordinance becomes inconsistent <br /> with the plan by reason of amendment to the plan. This bill, among <br /> other things, would provide that, in the event that a city or county <br /> fails to amend an inconsistent zoning ordinance within 90 days after <br /> receiving written notice of the inconsistency, a proposed <br /> development project shall not be deemed inconsistent with that <br /> zoning ordinance and related zoning standard or criteria and shall <br /> not be required to be rezoned, if there is substantial evidence that <br /> would allow a reasonable person to conclude that the proposed <br /> development project is consistent with objective general plan <br /> standards and criteria but the zoning for the project site is <br /> inconsistent with the general plan. <br /> 6 AB 894 The Planning and Zoning Law requires each county and city to Oppose unless Pending/Pending <br /> (Friedman) adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for its physical amended <br /> development, and the development of certain lands outside its <br /> Parking boundaries, that includes, among other mandatory elements, a <br /> housing element. Current law also authorizes the legislative body of <br /> requirements: a city or a county to adopt ordinances establishing requirements for <br /> shared parking. parking. This bill would require a public agency, as defined, to allow <br /> existing land uses with underutilized parking, as defined, to share <br /> 3111 <br /> Updated 4.10.23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.