Laserfiche WebLink
P20-0989, Objective Design Standards Planning Commission <br />6 of 12 <br />• Other Comments: Comments related to the usability of balconies and other private <br />open space areas were raised regarding several projects, as was the concept of <br />maximizing outdoor living. The Commission also thought that streetscape and <br />public views of projects are of most importance and should be prioritized over <br />internal site design. <br />Planning Commission Review of Draft ODS <br />The Planning Commission has reviewed and discussed the ODS at several meetings, as <br />outlined below. On January 11, 2023, the Commission provided a favorable <br />recommendation of both ODS to the City Council. <br />• September 8, 2021: The Planning Commission held a two-part work session to <br />review: (1) draft changes to the 2012 Housing Site Development Standards and <br />Design Guidelines to reflect objective standards for Housing Sites; and (2) housing <br />densities for residential projects. The Commission asked questions of staff and the <br />professional services team and discussed a variety of topics, including project <br />density, open space, step backs and massing breaks, building materials, <br />architectural features, tax credit requirements, and development standards such as <br />setbacks. <br /> <br />• December 14, 2022: At this work session, the Commission reviewed draft ODS for <br />both the Housing Sites and the R-M, C-C, and M-U District sites. Members of the <br />Commission asked clarifying questions regarding a variety of topics in the ODS, <br />including affordability, unit size, landscaping and open space, trash receptacles, and <br />others. The Commission also received and reviewed public comment submitted for <br />this meeting. <br /> <br />• January 11, 2023: The Planning Commission was generally supportive of the ODS <br />for both the Housing Sites and the R-M, C-C, and M-U District sites and provided a <br />favorable recommendation to the City Council, with the modifications. The Planning <br />Commission also discussed building height for projects greater than 30 du/ac but <br />less than 40 du/ac and suggested staff and the professional services team consider <br />a reduced building height for projects that fall within this range, since the Housing <br />Sites ODS currently identify a building height maximum of approximately 65 feet for <br />projects with density 30 du/ac or greater. After considering this and reviewing <br />recently constructed projects built in the 30 du/ac range, staff recommended to the <br />City Council that this additional lower tier not be established, since many projects will <br />distribute or mix the density on a given site, meaning some areas of the site that are, <br />for example, setback from existing residents could be less tall whereas other areas <br />of the site could be denser and taller2. Another consideration is the inclusion of <br />podium parking or desired ground floor commercial uses, which would occupy the <br />ground floor and could require additional height to accommodate the residential units <br />above. <br /> <br /> <br />2 An example is the Vintage project, which mixed densities with some denser/taller portions (over 50 feet) and <br />some lower density/lower height components, while maintaining an overall average density of 30 du/ac.