My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
_Minutes_2022-11-09
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2023
>
04-12
>
_Minutes_2022-11-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2023 12:10:24 PM
Creation date
3/28/2023 12:10:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/12/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 5 November 9, 2022 <br />related site improvements on each parcel. The property is a zoned Planned Unit Development – <br />Agriculture (PUD-A) District. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mohan suggested consideration of inclusion of an accessory dwelling unit and utilizing <br />solar power. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mohan moved to approve Item 2. Commissioner Gaidos seconded the motion. <br /> <br />VOTE: <br /> <br />AYES: Commissioners Gaidos, Mohan, Morgan, Nibert, and Pace <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />PC-2022-12 approving PUD-145 was approved, as motioned. <br /> <br />MEETING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC <br /> <br />3. Public Comment from the audience regarding items not listed on the agenda – Speakers are <br />encouraged to limit comments to 3 minutes. <br /> <br />There were no speaker cards submitted. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING AND OTHER MATTERS <br /> <br />4. P21-0751, 2023-2031 (6th Cycle) Housing Element Update – Review and receive public <br />comments on the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report for the 2023-2031 (6th Cycle) <br />Housing Element <br /> <br />Chair Pace introduced and provided background information for the item. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Megan Campbell presented the staff report and PowerPoint presentation. <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner Nibert, Director of Community Development Clark explained that the <br />Planning Commission and City Council had the latitude to consider alternatives and that the California <br />Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) did not review the environmental impact <br />report (EIR). <br /> <br />Commissioner Nibert discussed the findings of unavoidable significant impact and the need to <br />determining if the project had enough benefit to outweigh the impacts. Ms. Clark explained statements <br />of overriding consideration. Commissioner Nibert asked the threshold for Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). <br />Ms. Clark discussed the metrics for VMT and greenhouse gases. In response to Commissioner Nibert, <br />City Engineer Tassano explained the measurement of resident VMT; Countywide average; and <br />Mitigation Measure Transportation Measure 2. <br /> <br />Commissioner Nibert discussed the timing of the groundwater alternatives study and potential need to <br />modify the Housing Element. Ms. Clark explained that the EIR was a disclosure document and <br />conservative water supply finding due to current uncertainty. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.