My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-2023-05
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2023
>
PC-2023-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2023 3:38:35 PM
Creation date
3/22/2023 3:26:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/11/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Retention of Mall Core: In each of the conceptual scenarios, the mall "core" remains <br />without significant modification to square footage, although in some instances existing <br />vacant retail buildings such as the former Sears and Nordstrom stores could be <br />demolished and replaced with other uses. <br />Retention of Existing Sites Zoned for Housing: In each of the conceptual scenarios, the <br />properties2 already designated for housing during the 4th Cycle Housing Element are not <br />"counted" toward the 900-1,440 units, since these sites have already been zoned for <br />housing and the units allocated in a prior Housing Element cycle. <br />Reduced Commercial Parking Ratio: Each conceptual scenario presumes vehicular <br />parking at a ratio of 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet of commercial square footage. This <br />is a modified standard compared to the existing ratio of approximately 5 spaces per <br />1,000 square feet, but is consistent with the Pleasanton Municipal Code (PMC) <br />minimum parking ratio for retail and office uses. While this change would require <br />concurrence on behalf of all owners and modification to private agreements, general <br />consensus among the owners has been to reduce the amount of surface parking <br />contained on the site. The mall owner has emphasized the need for "pools" of <br />convenient customer parking to be provided around the mall, potentially in smaller <br />surface parking lots. <br />Parking for New Residential and other Development: Adequate parking for housing <br />developments could be provided by each project, either as garage structured parking in <br />a "wrap" configuration, or in podium-style apartment buildings. <br />Circulation Network: As illustrated, the primary vehicular circulation around the mall <br />could remain on Stoneridge Mall Road. However, additional points of access to the mall <br />core and between new development areas are suggested as shown on the diagrams for <br />the scenarios, with the objective of facilitating vehicular and pedestrian connection <br />around the mall. A multi-use perimeter path could be constructed along the inner side of <br />Stoneridge Mall Road (i.e., adjacent to the mall properties) and pedestrian walkways <br />could be provided throughout the site to allow access to the shops and connect <br />between various portions of the site and Stoneridge Mall Road. Prominent, high-quality <br />connections consisting of well-lit stairs and ramps at significant grade changes at <br />locations where major department stores remain (which occur near both Macy's stores <br />and near JC Penney) could be constructed to facilitate and encourage pedestrian <br />access. A direct promenade path from the mall to BART and the Workday campus is <br />provided in the scenarios. <br />Page 7 of 17
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.