13 - Laserfiche WebLink

Fi ure 21: Required Front Yard Building Setbacks 11' T 4' 5 8 6'min 5' I 10'min f Since the February 22, 2023, Planning Commission meeting, the applicant has refined the project site plan to provide a clearer site plan with more specifically defined building setback dimensions, enabling staff to provide a more precise summary of conformance with setbacks4 As indicated in the refined site plan, the project would provide substantial and varied building setbacks around different sides of the proposed building. The minimum building setback (at the northwest corner of the building adjacent to the intersection of Drive Aisles `A' and `B') is approximately 17 feet and four inches, the largest building setback (at the southeast corner of the building adjacent to the intersection of both segments of Stoneridge Mall Road) is approximately 45 feet and three inches. Other setbacks range from approximately 24 to 51 feet. Based on the refined site plan and the more clearly defined building setbacks, the project is fully compliant (and would in most cases substantially exceed) the minimum required building setbacks specified in the 2012 Housing Sites Design Standards and Guidelines. Within these areas, the project would provide generous landscaping and pedestrian features as specified in the 2012 document, helping to further soften and buffer the new residential building. Floor Area Ratio The 2012 Housing Standards and Design Guidelines do not identify a maximum floor- area-ratio for projects on any of the 4th Cycle Housing Element sites. The total square footage of the building including the residential and parking structure uses is approximately 618,370 square feet, resulting in a floor-area-ratio of 1.7 based on the approximately six-acre site. As noted elsewhere, the project would comply with other 'The February 22,2023, Planning Commission agenda report(Attachment 7)provides a setback discussion based on the information provided at that time in the project plans,as interpreted by staff.Although the overall conclusion that the project would comply with setback requirements remains unchanged,the information in the body of this section updates and refines the February 22 analysis. Page 31 of 41