Laserfiche WebLink
of these features would not allow for the project to fit on the development site, <br /> and thus not be feasible to construct at the proposed density. <br /> Staff finds the applicant has provided sufficient evidence to support the requested <br /> waivers, and none of the findings allowable under State law to deny the requests can be <br /> made, and so recommends the two requested waivers be granted. <br /> Excluding the exceptions above, and as detailed in the applicant's 2012 Housing Site <br /> Development Standards and Design Guidelines Compliance Chart in Attachment 4, <br /> staff finds the project is otherwise fully compliant with the remaining requirements <br /> specified by the applicable 2012 Housing Guidelines. <br /> Site Plan <br /> The site plan has been designed to allow access to the project site from both segments <br /> of Stoneridge Mall Road with the primary entrance generally off the segment along the <br /> east side of the project. An internal motor-court area would provide internal circulation <br /> leading to the main parking structure entrance and exit. A secondary entrance and exit <br /> for the parking structure would be located along the internal loop segment of Stoneridge <br /> Mall Road. Multiple pedestrian access points would be provided on all sides of the <br /> project, with the focus and majority of those off both segments of Stoneridge Mall Road. <br /> The building itself, and its most prominent design features, face toward the intersection <br /> of both segments of Stoneridge Mall Road providing a significant street presence and <br /> entry statement for the project while also providing enhanced pedestrian entrance <br /> points and perimeter landscaping to give the project an appropriate pedestrian scale <br /> and to address the streets and access ways surrounding the project. Staff finds the <br /> proposed site plan is acceptable and consistent with 2012 Design Guideline <br /> recommendations including but not limited to: a well-defined and landscaped pedestrian <br /> network around the project that also anticipates future connections with surrounding <br /> development; building orientation toward public and internal streets; appropriately <br /> designed public and internal street design with separated sidewalks and adequate <br /> landscaping on both sides; and significant areas of internal common use open space. <br /> Setbacks <br /> The 2012 Design Guidelines prescribe building setbacks for new development. Front <br /> building setbacks are based upon the types of street frontages a building is located <br /> along. Side and rear building setbacks are predetermined and are not street frontage <br /> type dependent. Table 4 below summarizes the potential building setbacks applicable to <br /> the project. Figure 21 below provides an illustrative layout of the required front yard <br /> building setbacks for new development along public streets and/or along internal <br /> streets/drives. <br /> Table 4: Required Building Setbacks <br /> Front Building Setbacks <br /> Along Public Streets 21 ft. min. (6 ft. planting/5 ft. sidewalk/10 ft. planting behind walk) <br /> Along Internal Streets/Drives 17 ft. min. 4 ft. planting/5 ft. sidewalk/8 ft. planting behind walk <br /> Rear Building Setbacks 20 ft. min. <br /> Side Building Setbacks 8 ft. min. one side/20 ft. min. both sides combined <br /> Page 30 of 41 <br />