My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
032123
>
14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2023 8:23:06 AM
Creation date
3/16/2023 8:18:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/21/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
canceled in Attachment 1 , allowing funds to be reallocated as reflected in Attachment 2 to <br /> this memo. Staff is requesting this input to prepare for the budget workshop on April 18, <br /> 2023, since the presentation will include a table similar to Attachment 2 which will lead to the <br /> recommendation of which projects should be funded. <br /> The Need for An Asset Management Plan <br /> In 2018, staff began work on a ten-year infrastructure plan, which was identified as a City <br /> Council priority. The purpose of the plan was to predict Capital Improvement Program funding <br /> needs over a ten-year period. The City has traditionally budgeted for its Capital Improvement <br /> Program using a "Pay-Go" approach: projects are only prioritized and approved when funds <br /> are available to complete them. The ten-year infrastructure plan was thought to be a way of <br /> determining whether the traditional funding practice should continue or whether other funding <br /> options should be considered. <br /> Due to the pandemic and other competing priorities, work on the ten-year infrastructure plan <br /> stopped before it was complete and presented to the City Council. However, the discussion <br /> of the upcoming four-year CIP budgeting process foreshadows the difficulty the City faces <br /> using the "Pay-Go" system with current revenue streams. <br /> Recently, staff again began work on the ten-year infrastructure plan, using the prior work as <br /> the starting point but reviewing the plan to ensure it represents current priorities. The ten-year <br /> infrastructure plan includes all projects, but it divides the projects into two categories: <br /> Enhancement projects and State of Good Repairs projects. Enhancement projects are <br /> defined as new or expanded facilities and infrastructure projects such as the proposed Ken <br /> Mercer Sports Park Skatepark Expansion project, the All-Abilities Playground project, and the <br /> proposed Century House Renovation project. State of Good Repair projects are the <br /> significant maintenance projects required for the City's existing facilities and infrastructure to <br /> be periodically returned to like-new condition. They are differentiated from the day-to-day <br /> maintenance activities performed by City personnel and on-call contractors, primarily <br /> because they are implemented as a Capital Improvement Project that is designed, bid, and <br /> built. Examples of State of Good Repair projects include projects such as the annual concrete <br /> and roadway paving projects, as well as other projects like the recent replacement of Fire <br /> Station No. 3 and the significant reconstruction of the library roofing and window system that <br /> is currently underway. <br /> In reviewing the prior work, staff found that although this division of projects is logical, over <br /> the ten-year period the plan leaned toward State of Good Repair projects more often as <br /> compared to Enhancement projects. This is understandable given that staff prepared the ten- <br /> year plan by estimating what was necessary to periodically bring existing facilities and <br /> infrastructure back to like-new condition but found it more challenging to predict what <br /> Enhancement projects would be prioritized and when. The prior plan made the assumption <br /> that Enhancement projects would occur and included a placeholder dollar amount. With <br /> staff's recent work on the ten-year infrastructure plan, only the Enhancement projects known <br /> from recent City Council discussions and priority setting are included, with a large component <br /> of the plan still being staff's estimate of required major maintenance to maintain the status <br /> quo. <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.