My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 231365
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020-present
>
2023
>
RES 231365
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2023 3:53:00 PM
Creation date
3/10/2023 3:52:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/21/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton <br /> CEQA GHG Emissions Thresholds and Guidance <br /> lead agency should briefly explain how compliance with the threshold means that the <br /> project's impacts are less than significant. Compliance with the threshold does not relieve a <br /> lead agency of the obligation to consider substantial evidence indicating that the project's <br /> environmental effects may still be significant.15 <br /> CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4 <br /> (a) The determination of the significance of GHG emissions calls for a careful judgment by the <br /> lead agency consistent with the provisions in section 15064. A lead agency shall make a <br /> good-faith effort, based to the extent possible on scientific and factual data,to describe, <br /> calculate or estimate the amount of GHG emissions resulting from a project. A lead agency <br /> shall have discretion to determine, in the context of a particular project,whether to <br /> (1) Quantify GHG emissions resulting from a project; and/or <br /> (2) Rely on a qualitative analysis or performance-based standards. <br /> (b) In determining the significance of a project's GHG emissions,the lead agency should focus <br /> its analysis on the reasonably foreseeable incremental contribution of the project's <br /> emissions to the effects of climate change. A project's incremental contribution may be <br /> cumulatively considerable even if it appears relatively small compared to Statewide, <br /> national or global emissions.The agency's analysis should consider a timeframe that is <br /> appropriate for the project.The agency's analysis also must reasonably reflect evolving <br /> scientific knowledge and State regulatory schemes. A lead agency should consider the <br /> following factors,among others,when determining the significance of impacts from GHG <br /> emissions on the environment: <br /> (1) The extent to which the project may increase or reduce GHG emissions as compared to <br /> the existing environmental setting. <br /> (2) Whether the project emissions exceed a threshold of significance that the lead agency <br /> determines applies to the project. <br /> (3) The extent to which the project complies with regulations or requirements adopted to <br /> implement a Statewide, regional, or local plan for the reduction or mitigation of GHG <br /> emissions (see, e.g.,section 15183.5[b]).Such requirements must be adopted by the <br /> relevant public agency through a public review process and must reduce or mitigate the <br /> project's incremental contribution of GHG emissions. If there is substantial evidence <br /> that the possible effects of a particular project are still cumulatively considerable <br /> notwithstanding compliance with the adopted regulations or requirements, an EIR must <br /> be prepared for the project. In determining the significance of impacts,the lead agency <br /> may consider a project's consistency with the State's long-term climate goals or <br /> strategies, provided that substantial evidence supports the agency's analysis of how <br /> those goals or strategies address the project's incremental contribution to climate <br /> change and its conclusion that the project's incremental contribution is not cumulatively <br /> considerable. <br /> (c) A lead agency may use a model or methodology to estimate GHG emissions resulting from a <br /> project.The lead agency has discretion to select the model or methodology it considers <br /> most appropriate to enable decision makers to intelligently take into account the project's <br /> incremental contribution to climate change.The lead agency must support its selection of a <br /> 15 2022 CEQA Guidelines. <br /> 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.