Laserfiche WebLink
AUGUSTIN BERNAL MOUNTAIN BIKE TRAIL PROJECT DRAFT INITIAL STUDY <br /> 12956 <br />DUDEK 22 April 2022 <br />24-hour PM2.5 standards. The area is in attainment or unclassified for all other federal standards. The <br />area is designated non-attainment for State standards for 1-hour and 8-hour O3, 24-hour PM10, annual <br />PM10, and annual PM2.5. <br />On April 19, 2017, the BAAQMD adopted the Spare the Air: Cool the Climate Final 2017 Clean Air <br />Plan (BAAQMD 2017b). The 2017 Clean Air Plan provides a regional strategy to protect public <br />health and protect the climate. To protect public health, the 2017 Clean Air Plan includes all <br />feasible measures to reduce emissions of O3 precursors (ROG and NOx) and reduce O3 transport to <br />neighboring air basins. In addition, the 2017 Clean Air Plan builds upon the BAAQMD efforts to <br />reduce fine particulate matter and TACs. To protect the climate, the 2017 Clean Air Plan defines a <br />vision for transitioning the region to a post-carbon economy needed to achieve ambitious <br />greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets for 2030 and 2050, and provides a regional climate <br />protection strategy that will put the Bay Area on a pathway to achieve those GHG reduction targets. <br />The BAAQMD Guidelines identify a three-step methodology for determining a project’s consistency <br />with the current Clean Air Plan. If the responses to these three questions can be concluded in the <br />affirmative and those conclusions are supported by substantial evidence, then the BAAQMD <br />considers the project to be consistent with air quality plans prepared for the Bay Area. <br />The first question to be assessed in this methodology is “does the project support the goals of the <br />Air Quality Plan?” The BAAQMD-recommended measure for determining project support for these <br />goals is consistency with BAAQMD thresholds of significance. If a project would not result in <br />significant and unavoidable air quality impacts, after the application of all feasible mitigation <br />measures, the proposed project would be consistent with the goals of the 2017 Clean Air Plan. As <br />indicated in the following discussion, with regard to air quality impact questions b) and c), the <br />proposed project would result in less than significant construction and operational emissions. <br />Therefore, the proposed project would be considered to support the primary goals of the 2017 <br />Clean Air Plan and is consistent with the current Clean Air Plan. <br />The second question to be assessed in this consistency methodology is “does the project include <br />applicable control measures from the Clean Air Plan?” The 2017 Clean Air Plan contains 85 control <br />measures aimed at reducing air pollution in the Bay Area, including measures in the categories of <br />stationary sources, transportation, buildings, energy, agriculture, waste, water, natural and working <br />lands, and super-GHG pollutants. Projects that incorporate all feasible air quality plan control <br />measures are considered consistent with the Clean Air Plan. The proposed project would construct <br />an approximately 0.7-mile long, technical mountain bike trail. As a linear recreation facility, none <br />of the control strategies of the 2017 Clean Air Plan are applicable to construction and operation of <br />this project. <br />The third question to be assessed in this consistency methodology is “does the project disrupt or <br />hinder implementation of any control measures from the Clean Air Plan?” Examples of how a <br />project may cause the disruption or delay of control measures include a project that precludes an <br />extension of a transit line or bike path, or proposes excessive parking beyond parking <br />requirements. The proposed project would not create any barriers or impediments to planned or <br />future improvements to transit or bicycle facilities in the area, nor would it include excessive