Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton—Stoneridge Mall Residential Project <br />Section 15183 Checklist/15164 Addendum CEQA Checklist <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 173 <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480017/Consistency Checklist/21480017 Stoneridge Mall Residential Project Checklist <br />Addendum_Updated.docx <br />Therefore, there are no air traffic effects that are peculiar to the proposed project or the parcels on <br />which the proposed project would be located. Impacts would be less than significant and the <br />proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously <br />identified in the Prior EIR. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />Prior EIR Mitigation Measures <br />MM 4.N-7 The City shall require developers on the potential sites for rezoning to contribute <br />fair-share funds through the payment of the City of Pleasanton and Tri-Valley <br />Regional traffic impact fees to help fund future improvements to local and regional <br />roadways. <br />Conclusion <br />The proposed project would not result in any transportation impacts beyond those considered in the <br />Prior EIR. All impacts continue to be less than significant, and no additional mitigation is required. <br />The proposed project is consistent with the development evaluated in the certified Prior EIR and <br />would not result in any new impacts or increase the severity of any previously identified impacts as <br />compared to what was already identified and disclosed, either individually or cumulatively. <br />Further environmental analysis is not required because: <br />• No peculiar impacts that are not substantially mitigated have been identified as a result of <br />the proposed project or its site. Application of uniformly applied General Plan policies and <br />standards, implementation of relevant Prior EIR mitigation measures, along with <br />regulations of the City of Pleasanton and incorporation of identified project design <br />features will ensure impacts are below the level of significance. <br />• There are no potentially significant impacts that were not analyzed as significant in the <br />Prior EIR. <br />• There are no potentially significant off-site and/or cumulative impacts that were not <br />discussed by the Prior EIR. <br />• No substantial new information has been identified that results in an impact that is more <br />severe than anticipated by the Prior EIR. <br />