My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
3_Exhibit C_ADDENDUM ONLY
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2023
>
02-22
>
3_Exhibit C_ADDENDUM ONLY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2023 2:21:14 PM
Creation date
2/17/2023 2:20:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/22/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
3
(Message)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2023\02-22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Stoneridge Mall Residential Project <br />CEQA Checklist Section 15183 Checklist/15164 Addendum <br /> <br /> <br />112 FirstCarbon Solutions <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480017/Consistency Checklist/21480017 Stoneridge Mall Residential Project Checklist <br />Addendum_Updated.docx <br />2017 Scoping Plan Update Reduction Measure Project Consistency <br />stakeholders, and with the public, to develop <br />measures as outlined in the Scoping Plan Update <br />and the governor’s Executive Order B-30-15 to <br />reduce GHG emissions and to cultivate net carbon <br />sequestration potential for California’s natural and <br />working land. <br />Source of ARB 2017 Scoping Plan Update Reduction Measures: California Air Resource Board (ARB). 2017. California’s <br />2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan. November. <br /> <br />As shown in Table 11, implementation of the proposed project would not conflict with the reduction <br />measures proposed in the Scoping Plan. As such, the proposed would not conflict with any <br />applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions, nor would <br />the proposed project generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a <br />significant impact on the environment. Therefore, this impact would be less than significant. <br />Therefore, there are no environmental effects that are peculiar to the proposed project or the <br />parcels on which the proposed project would be located. Impacts would be less than significant and <br />the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not <br />previously identified in the Prior EIR. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />None required. <br />Conclusion <br />The proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts than identified in the Prior <br />EIR.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.