Laserfiche WebLink
4. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures <br />J. Noise <br />TABLE 4.J-6 (Continued) <br />SUMMARY OF TRAFFIC NOISE MODELING RESULTS (EXISTING/EXISTING PLUS PROJECT) <br />NOISE EXPOSURE (LDN) AT 100 FEET FROM ROADWAY CENTERLINEa,b <br />General Plan Amendment and Rezonings 4.J-25 ESA / 210016 <br />Draft Supplement EIR September 2011 <br /> <br />Roadway Segment Existing (A) <br />Existing plus <br />Project (B) Change (B-A) Significant? <br />Vineyard West of Bernal 56 55 -1 No <br />Sunol North of Valley 63 61 -2 No <br />Sunol South of Valley 64 61 -3 No <br />Junipero Street East of Sunol 54 51 -3 No <br />Valley West of Sunol 57 56 -1 No <br />a Noise levels were calculated using the FHWA-RD-77-108 Traffic Noise Prediction Model for peak-hour conditions derived from average daily <br />traffic levels. Noise levels were calculated at 100 feet from the centerline of the roadway. b The average vehicle speed varies for individual segments between 25 mph and 45 mph, based on roadway classification. The vehicle mix <br />consists of 98 percent automobiles, 1 percent medium trucks, and 1 percent heavy trucks for neighborhood arterial roads and 96 percent <br />automobiles, 2 percent medium trucks, and 2 percent heavy trucks for major arterial roads. <br /> <br /> The thresholds of significance include a 5+ dB increase in project-related traffic noise exposure or a project-related increase in traffic noise <br />exposure that would cause overall traffic noise levels to exceed the applicable 60dBLdn standard for single-family land uses or 65dBLdn standard <br />for multi-family land uses. Each roadway segment was reviewed via aerial photo to identify the existence of residential uses, existing noise- <br />mitigating construction (i.e., noise barriers) for these uses, and to determine if project-related noise increases could exceed the established <br />significance criteria. A significant noise impact was established for those roadway segments where project-related noise increases would be 5+ <br />dB or where the project-related increase could cause noise exposure to exceed the applicable 60/65 dB Ldn noise exposure limit in residential <br />recreation areas. <br /> <br />SOURCE: Environmental Science Associates, 2011 <br /> <br /> <br />The City is expected to repave all arterial roadways with noise-attenuating pavement in the future. It <br />is expected that the sections of Hopyard Road and Stoneridge Drive highlighted in Table 4.J-6 <br />would be included for this treatment. However, the timing of this paving is unknown, and existing <br />noise-sensitive uses on these roadway segments may be impacted prior to its completion. Therefore, <br />this impact is considered potentially significant. Mitigation Measure 4.J-5a would mitigate <br />impacts of the rezoning to off-site sensitive receptors to a less than significant level. <br />Methods for reducing off-site noise from project related traffic may include repaving with noise <br />attenuating pavement, new windows at existing sensitive receptors, sound walls, or other measures. <br />Studies have found that the application of noise-attenuating pavements produces typical noise level <br />reduction in the range of 3-5 dB over traditional asphalt paving (Bollard and Brennan, 1999). This <br />effort would more than account for the 1 dB increase produced by implementation of the project. <br />Mitigation Measure 4.J-5a: Prior to prior to PUD approval a potential site for rezoning <br />would add traffic noise in exceed of 55dBA described in Table 4.J-6, the project applicant <br />shall conduct an off-site noise study to determine the project contribution to off-site <br />roadway noise and contribute its fair-share to mitigate the established noise impact. <br />Further, as shown in Table 4.J-6, developments adjacent to several of the studied roadways may <br />experience traffic noise exposure in excess of 65 dB. Given a worst-case exterior-to-interior noise <br />level reduction of 20 dB provided by project buildings, interior noise exposure could be 45 dB Ldn <br />or higher within some project building. Development on the potential sites for rezoning would be <br />subject to Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, which requires an interior noise <br />exposure of 45 dB Ldn/CNEL or less within any habitable room and requires an acoustical