Laserfiche WebLink
Arborist Report, Stoneridge Shopping Center, 1008 Stoneridge Mall Rd March 10, 2022 (updated 6/21/22) <br />Jennifer Tso, BCMA 2 <br />Project Summary <br />The project area consists of a six acre portion of the <br />parking lot of the Stoneridge Shopping Center, <br />immediately west of the Stoneridge Mall Rd & <br />Stoneridge Mall Rd intersection. The west third of the <br />lot is more heavily used due to its proximity to the <br />stores. The proposed project will convert the eastern <br />two-thirds of the parking lot into a residential <br />development. In addition to the new structures, the <br />street frontages will also be improved, with a new <br />sidewalk fronting the public right-of way of the new <br />development. The grade of Drive Aisle A, which is a <br />drive aisle that borders the northwest edge of the <br />project area, will also be lowered. <br /> <br />I included 169 trees in my tree inventory, which <br />includes additional trees outside of the proposed <br />project area. Fourteen species were included, four of <br />which comprise over half of the tree count (Callery <br />pear, London planetree, Canary Island pine, Deodar <br />cedar). Trees are planted either in very small planters <br />where they occur in the center of the parking lot, or in <br />larger landscape areas along the perimeters. As <br />expected, the trees in the small planters are generally <br />in worse condition than those with larger growing <br />spaces. <br /> <br />The majority of the trees - 105 in total, 27 of which are <br />“Heritage” trees - will need to be removed due to high <br />encroachment. There is limited opportunity to adjust the <br />design of the development to increase tree <br />preservation. For instance, the road frontage <br />improvements are mandated by the City, and the <br />grading of Drive Aisle A will also impact the row of trees <br />located across from the mixed-use structure. The 64 <br />trees that can be retained are located west of the <br />project area - assuming they remain fully clear of <br />construction. <br /> <br />Assumptions & Limitations <br />This report is based on my site visits between February <br />10-15, 2022 and the following plans: <br />• Site/tree preservation plan by Kimley Horn <br />dated 3/17/22) <br />• Tree assessment plan by HortScience | Bartlett <br />Consulting dated March 2019 <br /> <br />It was assumed that the trees and the proposed improvements were accurately surveyed. A few <br />trees were not surveyed, so I approximately located them on the Tree Preservation Plan. Their <br />precise locations will not affect the recommendations in this report. I did not review any other plans, <br />such as drainage, utility, landscape, etc. The recommendations in this report are thus preliminary <br />and may need to be revised once more detailed plans are available. The health and structure of the <br />trees were assessed visually from ground level. No drilling, root excavation, or aerial inspections <br />Figure 1. (top) London planetree #148 is among one of <br />the best trees on the property. Temporary chain-link <br />fencing shall be installed around the tree to limit damage <br />to its roots when the planter shape is changed. By <br />contrast, mulberry #182 (below) is severely stressed <br />with a dead top and fully cankered trunk.