SUPPLEMENTAL - Laserfiche WebLink

As Vice-Chair of the Civics Arts Commission, I have spent the last two years in efforts to encourage and promote the arts.While serving on the"Public Art Website Committee" (October 4,2021) 1 analyzed three suggested city websites and submitted a written report on Palo Alto,San Mateo, and San Leandro. I then engaged in an hour zoom meeting with City staff to point out the progressive and engaging San Leandro website where the Arts held a prominent place, unlike Pleasanton's obscure and hard-to-find limited information. My charge now became to write about each of the public art pieces. I became the sole writer of 36 short essays describing each public art and 9 utility boxes.The writings were intended to engage the public in appreciating Pleasanton's public art, learn about the artist,and the location of the art,and identify the contributor. Nothing has happened with these writings. They languish under inaction. I requested some be released to the local newspaper to encourage public awareness and promote visibility. I was told the City process might allow a release of only one a month, at best.As of today, my considerable efforts have resulted in no results.Also, my understanding is that the City website is being rebuilt. There has been no contact or communication between the contractor and the"Public Art Website Committee" nor myself requesting any kind of input. The Civics Arts Commission engaged in a public discussion about the small number of applicants for the Community Grant Program.Various commissioners suggested revising and abbreviating the application to encourage a wider range of applicants. It became clear it was not a point of further City discussion when the only change in the application was to bold a phrase on page 10 of the application noting the evaluation criteria. Apparently,the Community Grant Program-Civics Arts and Youth-are intertwined and not open for suggested revision. The pace at which the Civics Arts Commission is able to proceed is hindered by a lack of consistent meetings of the PASS Committee. PASS is a sub-committee of Civics Arts. Since 2022, requests to convene this committee have been postponed for the Feb 6, 2023 election of a Civics Arts member to PASS. The existing 2021-2022 Civics Arts members could have been long ago involved allowing the discussion and approval of proposed art to then be recommended to the Civics Arts Commission. Items on the Civics Arts agenda labeled "future agenda"do not have a timetable for action. Feb 6,2023,future agenda includes: City-Wide Strategic Plan,QR codes, utility boxes,and the all-important 2014 Cultural Plan. Missing is the Teen Poet selection.All of these are important points of consideration but the March meeting will be devoted to the Civics Arts grant allocation;the May 4, meeting is a joint meeting with the Library Commission (where the future items will not be discussed); The August meeting is slated as Civics Arts Division Annual Presentation,Oct. 11, 2023 meeting is a joint meeting with the Youth Commission (again no action on future agenda items) the November 6,the meeting is the Community Grant funding Criteria and Community Grants Final Report. The 2014 Cultural Plan needs updating.There is great hope that the"future items" in the 2014 Cultural Plan revision will find an action meeting date. It will deserve considerable time and effort. I believe City staff to be hardworking. The Civics Arts Commission does not belong under the Library and Recreation umbrella which is a small part of the job. The Arts should be recognized as an important force in creating the vitality of Pleasanton's community and businesses. I share these thoughts with you as a concerned community member. I can be reached for further comment at My comments do not reflect my position as the Vice-Chair of the Civics Arts Commission. I am not speaking for the commission but rather as a concerned public servant. Sincerely, Janice Coleman-Knight Pleasanton resident z