Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT 4 <br />Stoneridge Mall Framework <br />Public Comments <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Provided for the December 15, 2022, Joint Planning Commission and City Council meeting <br />Redistributed for the Planning Commission meeting on January 11, 2023 and City Council meeting on January 26, <br />2023 <br /> Page 18 <br /> <br />From: Squarespace <br />Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2022 9:10 PM <br />To: Emily Carroll <ecarroll@cityofpleasantonca.gov> <br />Subject: Form Submission - New Form <br /> <br />Sent via form submission from Stoneridge Mall Framework <br /> <br />Name: Matt Maciel <br /> <br />Email: email@email.com <br /> <br />Message: I liked the examples of the potential designs. My preference was for version 2A. I feel that <br />version would allow for building cohesiveness since it would be essentially one big complex on the <br />northside. Version 2A would shield the mall and amenities from the BART facilities, visually and <br />physically, but still make BART convenient. With the rise of homelessness and mentally ill population, <br />who historically like to hang out in parks and plazas by BART, I think we need to take mitigating design <br />steps to discourage this behavior. By having a residential complex separating the mall proper and BART, <br />I believe would help alleviate this problem. <br /> <br />Version 2A also allows for a more traditional mall experience on the southside of the complex (parking <br />and walking to store) while the northside would allow a more modern mixed use mall experience. The <br />best of both worlds! <br /> <br />As a neighborhood resident, I would not use the open spaces. However, I would appreciate nicely <br />designed walkways on my way to dining or shopping, but I don't see myself hanging out just to hangout. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Does this submission look like spam? Report it here. <br />