My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01 ATTACHMENT 3
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
012623 SPECIAL
>
01 ATTACHMENT 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2023 5:34:38 PM
Creation date
1/20/2023 5:34:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/26/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
01
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2023\012623 SPECIAL
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Financial Feasibility and Fiscal Impacts <br />As was noted previously during the August 2022 City Council meeting, sales tax <br />revenue generated by the mall has steadily declined, more steeply since 2015, <br />attributed principally to the growing popularity of e-commerce and impacts from the <br />COVI D-19 pandemic. Despite this trend, the location of the mall near two major <br />freeways, in close proximity to BART, and in a desirable community makes the mall <br />area a valuable asset from an economic perspective. With regard to retail, the mall's <br />owner Simon Property Group reports seeing a relatively good recovery among its <br />tenants, and its outlook on the prospects for the ongoing health of the mall's core retail <br />shops and anchor tenants remains very positive. Further, all owners have expressed an <br />interest in potential diversification of land use. <br />EPS notes that based on the types of uses being considered, high-density residential <br />and office are likely to be well-received by the market, followed by office and hotel; the <br />success of existing retail will likely be tied to overall redevelopment efforts. <br />While the conceptual scenarios could be expected to be economically viable over the <br />long-term, they are also subject to fluctuating market dynamics, and high cost of <br />development including infrastructure, financing, and amenities. Of the various land uses <br />referenced in the conceptual scenarios, high-density residential is likely to provide the <br />greatest investment return to a property owner; a large office building, such as <br />Workday, could also be favorable given the proximity to BART. New retail construction <br />is not as likely to "pencil" unless it is integrated with other land uses, such as high <br />density residential or large-scale office. <br />EPS provided a high-level analysis of the fiscal impact of the conceptual scenarios (i.e., <br />impact of the proposed land uses to the City's General Fund budget relative to existing <br />baseline conditions). The EPS analysis indicates that the fiscal performance of the three <br />scenarios relative to baseline conditions is highly sensitive to key assumptions related <br />to the future performance of the retail uses at the mall. If property owners are unable to <br />find desirable tenants to fill existing vacant spaces (e.g., those formerly occupied by <br />Sears and Nordstrom), then redevelopment for high-density residential and potentially <br />office or hotel, will have a positive impact on the City's General Fund budget relative to <br />baseline conditions (i.e., existing large vacant tenant spaces). Alternatively, if the <br />existing vacant spaces would otherwise be re-tenanted by highly successful retail <br />tenants, this outcome would likely be slightly preferable from a fiscal perspective as <br />compared to the baseline conditions. However, among the scenarios themselves, there <br />is not a significantly more positive or negative fiscal outcome for one (compared to <br />baseline conditions), when compared to each other. Finally, across all of the scenarios, <br />there is a positive fiscal balance for the City, in that the General Fund revenues <br />estimated from the future land uses (e.g., sales and property tax), would in each case <br />be greater than the cost of providing services to the project area. <br />Page14of17
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.