Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton 2023-2031 (6th Cycle) Housing Element Update <br />CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br /> <br /> <br />124 FirstCarbon Solutions <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480022/FOF/21480022 Pleasanton Housing Element FOF.docx <br />long-term impacts of all such projects would be cumulatively significant and to determine whether <br />the Housing Element Update itself would cause a “cumulatively considerable” incremental <br />contribution to any such cumulatively significant impacts. To determine whether the overall long- <br />term impacts of all such projects would be cumulatively significant, the analysis generally considers <br />the following: <br />• The area in which impacts would be experienced, <br />• Other past, proposed, and reasonably foreseeable projects that have had or are expected to <br />have impacts in the same area, <br />• The impacts or expected impacts of these other projects, <br />• The impacts of the proposed project that are expected in the area, and <br />• The overall impact that can be expected if the individual impacts from each project are <br />allowed to accumulate. <br /> <br />“Cumulative impacts” refers to two or more individual impacts that, when considered together, are <br />considerable, or that compound or increase other environmental impacts (State CEQA Guidelines § <br />15355). Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor but collectively significant impacts <br />taking place over time (State CEQA Guidelines § 15355(b)). If the analysis determines that potential <br />exists for the Housing Element Update, taken together with other past, present, and reasonably <br />foreseeable future projects, to result in a significant or adverse cumulative impact, the analysis then <br />determines whether the Housing Element Update’s incremental contribution to any significant <br />cumulative impact is itself significant (i.e., “cumulatively considerable”). Both conditions must apply <br />for the project’s cumulative effects to rise to the level of significance. <br />The cumulative impact analysis for each individual resource topic is presented in each resource <br />section immediately after the description of direct project impacts and identified mitigation <br />measures. As discussed above, the City finds that, except as to cumulative VMT and cumulative <br />water supply impacts, all cumulative impacts associated with the development consistent with the <br />Housing Element Update are either less than significant or less than significant with the <br />implementation of applicable mitigation and compliance with applicable regulations. Cumulative <br />VMT and water supply impacts remain significant even with incorporation of all feasible mitigation. <br />1.10 - Findings Regarding Growth Inducement <br />State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.2(e) requires a discussion of the ways in which a proposed <br />project could foster economic or population growth, or the construction of additional housing, <br />either directly or indirectly, in the surrounding environment. Typical growth-inducing factors might <br />be the extension of urban services or transportation infrastructure to a previously unserved or <br />underserved area, or the removal of major barriers to development. <br />The city currently has 28,602 housing units. The Housing Element Update does not propose or <br />entitle any specific development that would directly increase growth. Additionally, the Housing <br />Element Update cannot predict when any particular development would occur; however, the