Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton 2023-2031 (6th Cycle) Housing Element Update <br />CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br /> <br /> <br />108 FirstCarbon Solutions <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480022/FOF/21480022 Pleasanton Housing Element FOF.docx <br />construction equipment and materials to a development site would incrementally increase noise <br />levels on access roads leading to a site. Typically, a doubling of the ADT hourly volumes on a roadway <br />segment is required to result in an increase of 3 dBA in traffic noise levels, which is the lowest <br />change perceptible to the human ear in outdoor environments. Based on existing traffic volumes on <br />roadway segments adjacent to each potential site for housing, any future individual development <br />project’s construction trips would not be expected to double the hourly or daily traffic volumes <br />along roadway segments in the vicinity of a development site. For this reason, short-term <br />intermittent noise from construction trips would not be expected to result in a perceptible increase <br />in hourly or daily average traffic noise levels. <br />The second type of short-term noise impact is related to noise generated during site preparation, <br />grading, and construction activities. Construction is performed in discrete steps, each of which has <br />its own mix of equipment, and consequently, its own noise characteristics. These various sequential <br />phases would change the character of the noise generated on-site. Thus, the noise levels vary as <br />construction progresses. The site preparation phase of a future project, which includes excavation <br />and grading activities, generates the highest noise levels because the noisiest construction <br />equipment is earthmoving equipment. Development projects consistent with the Housing Element <br />Update would be expected to require the use of some of the loudest pieces of construction <br />equipment. A reasonable worst-case combined noise level during this phase of construction would <br />be 90 dBA Lmax at a distance of 50 feet from the acoustical center of a construction area. This would <br />result in a reasonable worst-case hourly average of 86 dBA Leq. <br />Construction noise within the City is restricted by the Municipal Code in intensity and hours of <br />operation. Because the potential sites for housing would be developed within the City limits, they <br />would be required to meet the requirements of the Municipal Code. In addition, the City has a code <br />enforcement system that would handle construction noise complaints. Enforcement of the restricted <br />hours of construction and the limit on the permissible maximum noise levels as measured at a <br />project site property plane would reduce potential construction noise impacts to not result in a <br />substantial temporary increase in ambient noise levels and would especially preclude potential <br />impacts during evening and nighttime hours. The Noise analysis presented in the Draft Program EIR <br />assumes that all future development projects on the potential sites for housing would follow <br />requirements of the Municipal Code. Individual housing development projects would be reviewed <br />and approved as required by the procedures of the Municipal Code and as outlined in Chapter 2, <br />Project Description, may require additional CEQA review, as appropriate. Therefore, on a program <br />level, future development of the potential sites for housing would result in less than significant <br />construction noise impacts. <br />Traffic Noise Impacts: The General Plan states that “an exterior increase of more than 4 decibels is <br />considered significant.” Table 3.11-7 on Page 3.11-21 – 22 of the Draft Program EIR shows a <br />summary of the traffic noise levels for projected traffic conditions without and with the Housing <br />Element Update, as measured at 50 feet from the centerline of the outermost travel lane. As is <br />shown in Table 3.11-7, no modeled roadway segment would experience an increase in traffic noise <br />levels of greater than 4 dBA compared to noise levels that would exist without implementation of <br />the Housing Element Update under existing plus project and cumulative plus project scenarios. Only