02 ATTACHMENT 1 - Laserfiche WebLink

City of Pleasanton 2023-2031 (6th Cycle) Housing Element Update CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations FirstCarbon Solutions 67 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480022/FOF/21480022 Pleasanton Housing Element FOF.docx Facts in Support of Findings: The geographic scope of the cumulative impact analysis for land use and planning is the Tri-Valley Planning Area and is delineated by the local service areas. Fire Protection Facilities: The geographic context for the analysis of cumulative impacts related to fire protection facilities includes the LPFD service area, which comprises the Cities of Pleasanton and Livermore. All cumulative projects within the LPFD service area would be required to comply with City ordinances and General Plan policies and programs that address fire protection services, including payment of a capital facilities fee to provide funding for adequate fire facilities to meet the broad range of needs of residents and businesses served by LPFD. Because past and present development will comply with all ordinances and policies, and there are mechanisms in place to ensure provision of adequate service, there would be no significant cumulative impact with respect to fire protection services. Future development would be required to comply with the policies and actions in the General Plan, as well as the Municipal Code, to ensure that fire protection services are adequate as future development is proposed. Police Protection Facilities: The geographic context for the analysis of cumulative impacts related to police protection facilities includes the Pleasanton Police Department service area, which comprises the City of Pleasanton. All cumulative projects within the Pleasanton Police Department’s service area would be required to comply with City ordinances and General Plan policies and programs that address police protection services, including payment of a capital facilities fee to provide funding for adequate police facilities to meet the broad range of needs of residents and businesses. Future development would be required to comply with the policies and actions in the General Plan, as well as the Municipal Code, to ensure that police protection services are adequate as future development is proposed. School Facilities: The geographic context for the analysis of cumulative impacts related to school facilities includes the PUSD-District boundaries. Future development would be required to pay the school impact fees adopted by PUSD, per SB 50, and this requirement is considered to fully address the impacts of development under State law and consistent with the Housing Element Update on school facilities. Library Facilities: The geographic context for analysis of cumulative impacts to library facilities includes Pleasanton residents who use Pleasanton Public Library. Development consistent with the Housing Element Update would be required to pay the capital facilities fee. Therefore, impacts associated with development consistent with the Housing Element on library facilities are not cumulatively considerable. Other Public Facilities: The geographic context for analysis of cumulative impacts to other public facilities includes the city limits. Development and growth in the city would increase demand for other public facilities. All cumulative projects would be required to comply with City ordinances and other policies that address other public facilities, including payment of the capital facilities fee. Future development would not create a need for new or physically altered other public facilities to maintain acceptable service ratios or other performance objectives.