Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton 2023-2031 (6th Cycle) Housing Element Update <br />CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br /> <br /> <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 51 <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480022/FOF/21480022 Pleasanton Housing Element FOF.docx <br />many of the potential site for housing propose exactly this type of strategy, with redevelopment of <br />existing, underutilized commercial properties. <br />Policy 2.3 would advance the Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance by requiring each residential and <br />nonresidential development to which the Ordinance applies to include its pro rata share of housing <br />needs for lower- and moderate-income households or, if the Ordinance criteria are met, to <br />contribute to the Lower Income Housing Fund or propose alternative methods to facilitate the <br />construction of housing affordable to these groups. Moreover, Policy 5.6 improves the quality of <br />housing choices for all residents by encouraging the development of residential units that are <br />accessible to persons with disabilities or are adaptable for conversion to residential use by persons <br />with disabilities. Program 5.3 helps to implement this policy by providing regulatory incentives, such <br />as expedited permit processing in conformance with the Community Care Facilities Act and fee <br />reductions where the development would result in an agreement to provide below-market housing <br />or services. Further, the City provides fee reductions per Pleasanton Municipal Code Chapter 18.86 <br />(Reasonable Accommodations) on the basis of hardship. Furthermore, the potential sites for <br />rezoning were determined through a site evaluation performed by the City, based on seven different <br />criteria that considered the 35 strategies set forth in Plan Bay Area 2050. These criteria include the <br />following: (1) site size and infill criteria, (2) proximity to modes of transportation, (3) proximity to <br />services and amenities, (4) environmental impacts/hazards, (5) impacts on sensitive resources, (6) <br />height and mass compatibility, and (7) interest in site. <br />City of Pleasanton General Plan, PUD, and Specific Plan Consistency: Development on most of the <br />potential sites for rezoning would require a General Plan Amendment. Development within Hacienda <br />on Sites 5 (Laborers Council), 7 (Hacienda Terrace), 8 (Muslim Community Center), 9 (Metro 580), <br />and 29 (Oracle), could also require an Amendment of the Hacienda PUD Plan. Development of Site <br />27 (PUSD-Vineyard) could also require amendment of the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan. <br />The proposed General Plan, PUD, and Specific Plan Amendments would be consistent with widely <br />accepted planning principles of facilitating logical and orderly growth, ensuring compatibility with <br />surrounding uses, and ensuring internal consistency among the goals and policies of the General <br />Plan, Hacienda PUD Plan, and Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan. When a project entails an <br />amendment to a general plan or specific plan, inconsistency with the existing designation provided <br />in a General Plan or specific plan is an element of the project itself, which then necessitates a <br />legislative policy decision by the agency and does not signify a potential environmental effect. <br />Moreover, as the City receives development applications for subsequent development consistent <br />with the Housing Element Update, those applications would be reviewed by the City for compliance <br />with the goals, policies, and programs of the General Plan and Hacienda PUD Plan and Vineyard <br />Avenue Corridor Specific Plan, as applicable. As such, if approved, the proposed General Plan, PUD, <br />and Specific Plan Amendments would serve as a self-mitigating aspect of the Housing Element <br />Update that would correct conflicts that would otherwise exist. <br />Zoning: All the potential sites for rezoning would be rezoned to allow for residential development <br />under a PUD district, subject to conformance with an established set of Objective Design Standards. <br />The Dublin-Pleasanton BART station property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development-Mixed <br />Use (PUD-MU), but allowable density would increase in line with that required to be permitted