Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton 2023-2031 (6th Cycle) Housing Element Update <br />CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br /> <br /> <br />46 FirstCarbon Solutions <br />Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480022/FOF/21480022 Pleasanton Housing Element FOF.docx <br />Surface Runoff: Future development consistent with the Housing Element Update encourages infill <br />development. New development or redevelopment could increase the total impervious area within <br />the city and increase stormwater runoff. Implementation of applicable General Plan policies would <br />maximize the on-site infiltration capacity for future development and would minimize the off-site <br />runoff that would leave those sites. Water Element Program 1.13 encourages the planting of <br />drought-tolerant landscaping to help decrease runoff and minimize impervious surfaces; Program 6.1 <br />encourages new development to utilize reclamation methods to fullest extent financially and <br />environmentally feasible; Program 10.1 requires the City to review development plans to minimize <br />impervious surfaces and generally minimize infiltration of rainwater in soils; and finally, Program 9.1 <br />requires new development to pay its fair share of the flood control improvement costs included in <br />Zone 7’s Master Plan. The General Plan also includes Water Element Policy 11, which requires <br />implementation of stormwater runoff requirements, as required by the State RWQCB and the <br />Alameda Countywide Clean Water Program, with as little impact on development and business costs <br />as possible. In support of this policy, the General Plan includes Programs 11.1, 11.2, 11.3, 11.4, 11.5, <br />11.6, and 11.8, all of which encourage new development to incorporate conditions of approval <br />developed by the Alameda Countywide Clean Water Program, adhere to design guidelines that <br />comply with clean water runoff requirements, incorporate site planning and design techniques that <br />reduce runoff into waterways, and use BMPs for construction activities to reduce unintended runoff. <br />The Municipal Code contains rules and regulations to maximize on-site infiltration capacity. Section <br />17.08 (Flood Damage Protection) provides requirements to reduce flood losses due to water or <br />erosion hazards, including the provision of facilities which serve such uses. All future development <br />would be evaluated on a project-by-project basis to ensure that there are no significant impacts <br />related to surface runoff and flooding and would be required to pay its fair share of the flood control <br />improvement costs. <br />Exceedance of Storm Drain Capacity: The Housing Element Update encourages development on infill <br />sites and discourages development on hillsides. With the exception of Sites 1 (Lester) and 22 <br />(Merritt), which are located adjacent to hillsides, none of the sites are located near a hillside. <br />General Plan policies and programs and Municipal Code requirements would maximize the on-site <br />infiltration capacity and would minimize off-site water runoff. All future development would be <br />required to comply with the General Plan policies and programs related to stormwater capacity, <br />specifically Water Element Policy 8, which ensures adequate storm drainage system to serve existing <br />and future development. Program 8.1 requires new development to pay its fair share of the storm <br />drainage system improvement costs, and Program 8.4 requires new development to improve local <br />storm drainage systems to accept appropriate design-year flows resulting from new development, as <br />determined by the City Engineer. Policy 4.2 of the Housing Element directs the City to ensure that <br />adequate infrastructure is available to support future planned residential growth and Program 4.4 <br />requires the City to develop and updates plans as necessary to address infrastructure deficiencies, <br />including funding mechanisms; the City would make infrastructure improvements as needed to <br />accommodate projected housing growth, which would generally be funded through the Capital <br />Improvement Program, in turn funded by the General Fund and developer impact and connection <br />fees. Storm drainage infrastructure would be included in this infrastructure planning and <br />development. Future development would be evaluated on a project-by-project basis for impacts to